Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T20:29:24.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

UV-Visible Response of Kraft Lignin in Soft Wood Black Liquor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Daojie Dong
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Department of Chemical Engineering, Gainesville, FL 32611
Arthur L. Fricke
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Department of Chemical Engineering, Gainesville, FL 32611
Get access

Abstract

UV-visible light absorption is an analytical method that is commonly used to determine the concentration of lignin in solution; however, there are uncertainties with this method, particularly for use in determining lignin concentration in black liquors. To try to resolve these uncertainties, a detailed study of UV-visible absorption by lignin in solution has been made.

A dual beam UV-visible instrument capable of repetitive scan was used. The effects of lignin concentration, lignin molecular weight, molecular weight dispersion, and solvent were examined as well as the effect of the reference solvent. Measurements were made for lignin dissolved in dilute caustic, DMF, THF, and DMSO. Measurements for soft wood black liquors were also made. A refined method for determining lignin concentration in soft wood black liquors resulted that is now being used in our research to evaluate lignin concentration in soft wood black liquor.

The results of the current work have led to improvements in this analytical method so that it appears to be less affected by lignin characteristics and by solution complexities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wexler, A.S., Analytical Chemistry, 36(1), 213221 (1964).Google Scholar
2. Zyl, J.D. Van, Wood Sci. Technol., 12(4), 251–9 (1978).Google Scholar
3. Boutelje, J.B. and Jonsson, U., Cellul. Chem. Technol., 14(1), 5367 (1980).Google Scholar
4. Alen, R., Patja, P. and Sjostrom, E., TAPPI, 62(11), 108–9 (1979).Google Scholar
5. Lin, S.Y. and Detroit, W.J., Ekman Day, Vol.4, 4452(1981).Google Scholar
6. Fricke, A.L., ”Physical Properties of Kraft Black Liquort Summary Report)Phass 1 and 2”, DOE Report #DOE/CE/40606-T5(DE88002991) P41–44, and P61.Google Scholar
7. Jonson, D.B., Moore, W.E. and Zank, L.C., TAPPI, 44(11), 793–8 (1961).Google Scholar
8. Mcnaughton, J.E., Yean, W.Q. and Goring, D.A., TAPPI, 50(11), 548552 (1967).Google Scholar
9. Simonson, R., Svensk Papperstidn., 74, 691 (1971).Google Scholar
10. Wildish, D.J., Pool, N.J. and Kristmanson, D.D., Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 16(2), 208213 (1976).Google Scholar
11. Bobie-, W.D., Poniatowski, S.E. and Walkinshaw, J.W., TAPPI, 64(10), 122–3 (1981).Google Scholar
12. Kleinert, T.N. and Joyce, C.S., Pulp. Paper Mag. Can., 58(7), 215 (1957).Google Scholar
13. Kleinert, T.N. and Joyce, C.S., TAPPI, 40(10), 813–21 (1957).Google Scholar
14. Lin, S.Y., Svensk Papperstidn., 85(18)U-, R162-R1T1 (1982).Google Scholar
15. Boutelje, J.B. and ErikSson-, I., Svensk Pappe~rstidn., 85(6), R39-R42 (1982).Google Scholar
16. Shimada, M., Fukuzuka, T. and Higuchi, T., TAPPI, 54(1), 72–8 (1971).Google Scholar
17. Janshekar, H., Brown, C. and Fiecher, A., Analytical Chemica Acta., 130(1), 8191 (1981).Google Scholar
18. Hill, M. and FPicke, A.L., TAPPI, 67(6), 100–3 (1984).Google Scholar
19. Kleinert, T.N., CA 74(6):23747r.Google Scholar
20. Lundquist, K. and Kirk, T.K., TAPPI, 63(1), 80 (1980).Google Scholar
21. Richtzenhain, H. and Dryselius, E., Svensk Papperstidn., 56, 324 (1953).Google Scholar
22. Lea, D.C., TAPPI, 37, 393–9 (1954).Google Scholar
23. Rice, F.A.H., and Fishbein, L.J., Am. Chem. Soc., 78, 1005–9 (1956).Google Scholar