Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T09:26:35.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

UV photoconductors based on Ga-doped ZnO films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Leelaprasanna J. Mandalapu
Affiliation:
leela@ee.ucr.edu, University of California at Riverside, Department of Electrical Engineering, B144 Dept of Elec. Engg., Univ. of CA at Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92521, United States
Faxian Xiu
Affiliation:
xiuf@ee.ucr.edu, University of California at Riverside, Department of Electrical Engineering, United States
Zheng Yang
Affiliation:
zyang@ee.ucr.edu, University of California at Riverside, Department of Electrical Engineering, United States
Jianlin Liu
Affiliation:
jianlin@ee.ucr.edu, University of California at Riverside, Department of Electrical Engineering, United States
Get access

Abstract

Ga-doped n-type ZnO films were grown by molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE) on R-plane sapphire substrates. Material characterizations such as photoluminescence (PL), X-ray diffraction (XRD), secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) and Hall measurements were carried out to characterize the optical, structural, and electrical properties of the film. Photoconductor devices for ultraviolet (UV) light detection were fabricated by depositing Al (250 nm)/Ti (20 nm) ohmic metal contacts. Linear characteristics were obtained from current-voltage (I-V) measurements that showed response to UV and visible illumination. Voltage dependent photocurrent (PC) spectra and responsivity spectrum were obtained to characterize the detection capability of the device in the UV region.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pearton, S. J., Norton, D. P., Ip, K., Heo, Y. W., and Steiner, T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 22, 932 (2004).Google Scholar
2. Alivov, Ya. I., Kalinina, E. V., Cherenkov, A. E., Look, D. C., Ataev, B. M., Omaev, A. K., Chukichev, M. V., and Bagnall, D. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 4719 (2003).10.1063/1.1632537Google Scholar
3. Look, D. C., Mater. Sci. Eng., B 30, 383 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Liu, Y., Gorla, C. R., Liang, S., Emanetoglu, N., Lu, Y., Shen, H., and Wraback, M., J. Electron. Mater. 29, 69 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Jeong, I.-S., Kim, J.-H., and Im, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 2946 (2003).Google Scholar
6. Aoki, T., Hatanaka, Y., and Look, D. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3257 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Ohya, Y., Niva, T., Ban, T., and Takahashi, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 40, 297 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Liu, M. and Kim, H. K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 173 (2004).Google Scholar
9. Hui, K. C., Ong, H. C., Lee, P. F., and Dai, J. Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 152116 (2005).Google Scholar
10. Porter, H. L., Cai, A. L., Muth, J. F., and Narayan, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 211918 (2005).Google Scholar
11. Ko, H. J., Chen, Y. F., Hong, S. K., Wenisch, H., Yao, T., and Look, D. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 3761 (2000).Google Scholar
12. Mandalapu, L. J., Xiu, F. X., Yang, Z., and Liu, J. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. (To be submitted)Google Scholar