Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:15:02.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Use of Mesoporous Systems for Preparation of One-Dimensional Ordered Magnetic Nanowires

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Andrei A. Eliseev
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Kirill S. Napolskii
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Dmitry F. Gorozhankin
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Alexei V. Lukashin
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Yuri D. Tretyakov
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Natalia A. Grigorieva
Affiliation:
St-Petersburg State University, St-Petersburg, 198504, Russia.
Sergei V. Grigoriev
Affiliation:
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, St. Petersburg, 188300, Russia.
A. A. Vorobieva
Affiliation:
Institute Laue-Langevin, B.P. 156, Grenoble Cedex 9, 38042, France.
Peter Görnert
Affiliation:
INNOVENT e.V., Prüssingstrasse 27 B, D- 07745 Jena, Germany. Fax +7-(095)-939–0998, e-mail: eliseev@inorg.chem.msu.ru
Get access

Abstract

Here we report the synthesis and investigation of iron and iron oxide nanowire arrays using mesoporous silica as a host material. In the present work a novel variant of synthesis of ordered magnetic nanowires in the mesoporous silica matrix was suggested. The method is based on the incorporation of a hydrophobic metal compound into the hydrophobic part of silica-surfactant composite. The amount of iron intercalated into the mesoporous matrix was measured by chemical analysis. In all samples it corresponds well to with the molar ratio SiO2: Fe = 9:1. To provide crystallinity of nanowires additional thermal treatment was performed. Thus prepared nanocomposites were characterized by TEM, ED, SAXS, SANS, BET and magnetic measurements. The anisotropy parameters of nanowires were determined using two non-correlated methods: temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility and small angle polarized neutron scattering. It was found that the particle length increases with the increasing of the decomposition temperature of the metal complex. Obviously it deals with crystallization and growth of metal particles inside the pores at a constant diameter of a single particle. For iron containing sample annealed at 375 °C (form factor of nanowire is about 40), the coercive force at room temperature was found to be 145 Oe at saturation magnetization of 1.2 emu/g, which is not far from modern information storage. It was shown that particles shape and size are in good agreement with that of the pores. Particles are uniform and well ordered in the silica matrix. Thus, the suggested method leads to one-dimensional anisotropic nanostructures which could find an application as high-density data storage magnetic media.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Thompson, D.A. and Best, J.S., IBM J. R&D 44 (3), 311 (2000).Google Scholar
2. Menon, A.K. and Gupta, B.K., Nanostruct. Mater. 11, 965 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Thomas, L., Lionti, F., Ballou, R., Gatteschi, D., Sessoli, R. and Barbara, B., Nature 383, 145 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Sun, S., Murray, Ch., Weller, D., Folks, L., Moser, A., Science 287, 1989 (2000)Google Scholar
5. Sato, H., Materials Transaction, JIM 34, 76 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Beck, J.S., Vartuli, J.C., Roth, W.J., Leonovicz, M.E., Kresge, C.T., Shmitt, K.D., Chu, C.T-W., Olson, D.H., Sheppard, E.W., McCullen, S.B., Higgins, J.B., Schlenker, J.L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 10834 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Hirokatsu, M., Kazuyuki, K., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 33, 7618 (1999).Google Scholar
8. De, G., Tapfer, L., Catalano, M., Battaglin, G., Caccavale, F., Gonella, F., Mazzoldi, P., Haglund, R.F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 3820 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Grun, M., Unger, K.K., Matsumoto, A., Tsutsumi, K., Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 27, 207 (1999).Google Scholar
10. Sirkin, V.G., Karbonilnie metalli, (Moscow, “Metallurgiya”, 1978) p. 256 (in Russian).Google Scholar
11. Kirovskaya, I.A., Adsorbcionnie processi, (Izdalelstvo Irkutskogo Universiteta, 1995) p. 299 (in Russian).Google Scholar
12. Wiedenmann, A., Physica B 297, 226 (2001).Google Scholar
13. Runov, V.V., Kopitsa, G.P., Okorokov, A.I., Runova, M.K., Glattli, H., JETP Lett. 69 (4), 353 (1999).Google Scholar
14. Dosch, K., Ustra, Al., Lied, A., Drexel, W., Peisl, J., Rev.Sci. Instrum. 63, 5533 (1992).Google Scholar
15. Jinwoo, C., Lee, K., Kang, H., Oh, S.J., Ri, H.-C., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. 635, C. 3.3.1–3.3.6. (2001).Google Scholar
16. Napolsky, K.S., Eliseev, A.A., Knotko, A.V., Lukashin, A.V., Vertegel, A.A., Tretyakov, Yu.D., Materials Science and Engineering C 23, 151 (2003).Google Scholar
17. Leslie-Pelecky, D.L., Rieke, R.D., Chem. Mater. 8, 1770 (1996).Google Scholar
18. Iwamoto, M., Abe, T. and Tachibana, Y., Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 155, 143 (2000).Google Scholar
19. Vassiliou, J.K., Mehrotra, V., Russell, M.W., Giannelis, P., McMichael, R.D., Shull, R.D. and Ziolo, R.F., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 5109 (1993).Google Scholar