Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:55:54.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trimethylgallium Decomposition on a Heated Si(100) Substrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

R. Lin
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, 1209 W. California St. Urbana II, 61801
Get access

Abstract

Trimethylgallium (TMGa) is an important source gas for metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) and metal-organic molecular beam epitaxy (MOMBE). In the last three years, workers in three different laboratories have examined the pyrolysis of trimethylgallium (TMGa) on heated substrates. However, the mechanism of the decomposition process is still not understood. In this paper we consider the mechanism of the TMGa decomposition on a hot Si(100) substrate in a molecular beam system. It is found that at TMGa doses of 1×1015 molecules/cm2 or less, the decomposition process in the beam system is the same as that reported by Lee et al., Surface Sci. 216, 173 (1989) in studies where TMGa was dosed at low temperature and then the substrate was heated. However, at higher TMGa doses, the mechanism in the molecular beam system is different than the ones reported previously. It is possible to transiently populate a weakly bound state which we assign to TMGa adsorption in the second monolayer. If me sample is below 400 K, the TMGa in the second monolayer desorbs. However, at higher temperatures, the TMGa in the second monolayer can react to form a CHx group (x=3 or 4) and dimethylgallium. The dimethylgallium desorbs. However, some of the CHx groups remain bound to the substrate leading to extra carbon incorporation. There also is evidence for formation of traces of monomethylgallium above 500 K and an indication of methyl radical desorption above 650 K. Thus it seems that at high doses, the decomposition of TMGa on a hot substrate is somewhat different than the decomposition of a monolayer of TMGa which has been adsorbed at low temperatures and then heated. These results explain some of the apparent discrepancies in the literature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature cited

1Lee, F., Gow, T. R., Masel, R. I., J. FJectrochem Soc, 136, (1989) 2640.Google Scholar
2Lee, F., Backman, A. L., Lin, R., Gow, T. R., Masel, R. I., Surface Sci. 213, 173 (1989).Google Scholar
3Lee, F., Gow, T. R., Lin, R., Backman, A. L., Lubben, D., Masel, R. I., Proc. MRS, 4131, 339 (1989).Google Scholar
4Squire, D. W., Dulcey, C. S., Lin, M. C., Proc. Materials Research Soc. 54, 709 (1986).Google Scholar
5Squire, D. W., Dulcey, C. S., Lin, M. C., Chem. Phys. Lett., 131, 112 (1986).Google Scholar
6Gow, T. R., Lin, R., Masel, R. I., J. Crystal Growth, to appearGoogle Scholar
7Gow, T. R., PhD Dissertation, Chemical Engineering Department, University of Illinois, Urbana Il. (1990).Google Scholar
8Nishizawa, J., Shimawaki, H., Kurabayashi, T., Kimura, M., SPIE, 796, 175 (1987).Google Scholar