Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T04:47:49.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trapping of Interstitials During Ion Implantation In Silicon*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

R.J. Culbertson
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
S.J. Pennycook
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
Get access

Abstract

The solid phase epitaxial regrowth of silicon implanted with a group V dopant, such as antimony, results in excellent incorporation of the dopant atoms into silicon lattice sites. However, annealing at higher temperatures or longer times results in transient dopant precipitation with a diffusion coefficient up to five orders of magnitude above that of tracer diffusion and with a reduced activation energy.

This precipitation is accompanied by the nucleation of dislocation loops that are interstitial in nature, and the transient ceases as the dislocation loops develop. It is believed that Si interstitials are trapped in a stable defect complex during the implantation process.

Although they survive SPE these complexes dissolve at higher temperatures and release a large supply of interstitials which serve to promote dopant migration via an interstitialcy mechanism until they condense to form the observed dislocation loops. By following the Sb implantation with an implantation of B to an equivalent concentration profile the loop formation is efficiently suppressed. For higher B concentrations the Sb precipitation is no longer observed. Results for As implantation are similar to Sb except that As precipitates can not be directly observed. Calculations of the dopant and interstitial concentration depth distributions were also performed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research sponsored by the Division of Materials Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-840R21400 with Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.

References

REFERENCES

1. Pennycook, S.J., Narayan, J., and Holland, O.W., J. Crystal Growth 70, 597 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Pennycook, S.J., Culbertson, R.J., and Narayan, J., J. Mat. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
3. Feldman, L.C., Mayer, J.W., and Picraux, S.T., in Materials Analysis by Ion Channeling (Academic Press, NY, 1982).Google Scholar
4. Robinson, M.T. and Torrens, I.M., Phys. Rev. B9, 5008 (1974); M.T. Robinson, Phys. Rev. B27, 5347 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Culbertson, R.J. and Pennycook, S.J., Nucl. Instrum. Methods (in press).Google Scholar
6. Appleton, B.R., in Ion Implantation and Beam Processing, ed. by Williams, J.S. and Poate, J.M. (Academic Press, Sydney, 1984) p. 197.Google Scholar
7. Fair, R.B., in Impurity Doping Processes in Silicon, ed. by Wang, F.F.Y. (North-Holland, NY, 1981) p. 315.Google Scholar
8. Chu, W.K., in Laser and Electron Beam Processing of Electronic Materials, ed. by Anderson, C.L., Celler, G.K., and Rozgonyi, G.A., Electrochem. Soc. Proc. 80–1 (1980) p. 361.Google Scholar
9. Tan, S.I., Berry, B.S., and Frank, W., in Ion Implantation in Semiconductors and Other Materials, ed. by Crowder, B.L. (Plenum Press, NY, 1973) p. 19.Google Scholar
10. Frank, W., Rad. Effects 21, 119 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar