Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T14:25:45.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transition Metal-Promoted Oxygen Ion Conductors as Oxidation Catalyst

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Wei Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Adel Sarofim
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Maria Flytzani-Stephanopoulos
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155
Get access

Abstract

A novel metal oxide composite catalyst for the complete oxidation of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons was prepared by combining oxygen ion conducting materials with active transition metals. The oxygen ion conductors used were typical fluorite-type oxides, such as ceria, zirconia, and others. Active base metal catalysts, such as copper, were used as additives to promote the catalytic properties of oxygen ion conductors. The intimate contact of the two kinds of materials gave rise to a highly active oxidation catalyst. On Cu-Ce-O composite catalysts, 95% of carbon monoxide was oxidized by air at ∼100 °C. Complete methane oxidation on the same catalyst took place at ∼550 °C. When the stoichiometric amount of sulfur dioxide was used to oxidize carbon monoxide, 96% of sulfur dioxide was reduced to elemental sulfur at temperatures above 460 °C with 99% of sulfur dioxide conversion. This type of composite catalyst also showed excellent resistance to water poisoning.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Spivey, J.J., Ind. Eng.Chem. Res. 26, 21652180(1987).Google Scholar
2. Satterfield, C.N., Heterogeneous Catalysis in Practice, 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991).Google Scholar
3. Stephens, R.E., Hirschler, D.A., Jr., Lamb, F.W., U.S. Patent No. 3 226 340(Dec. 28, 1965).Google Scholar
4. Schenker, B. A. and Taylor, Kirman, U.S. Patent No. 3 789 022(Jan. 29, 1974).Google Scholar
5. Voorhoeve, R.J.H., Johnson, D.W., Jr., Remeika, J.P., Gallagher, P.K., Science 195, 827833(1977).Google Scholar
6. Seiyama, T., Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng. 34, 281300(1992).Google Scholar
7. Wright, P.A., Natarajan, S., Thomas, J.M., Gai-Boyes, P.L., Chem.Mater. 4, 10531065(1992).Google Scholar
8. Yang, B.L., Chan, S.F., Chang, W.S., Chen, Y.Z., J. Catal. 130, 5261(1991).Google Scholar
9. Schlatter, J.C., Klimisch, R.L., Taylor, K.C., Science 179, 798800(1973).Google Scholar
10. Tuller, H.L. and Moon, P.K., Mater. Sci. & Eng. Bi, 171–191(1988).Google Scholar
11. Hagenmuller, P. and Gool, W. Van, Solid Electrolytes (Academic Press, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
12. Kim, D.J., J.Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 14151421(1989).Google Scholar
13. Yao, H.C. and Yao, Y.F.Y., J. Catal. 86, 254265(1984).Google Scholar
14. Crucq, A.(editor), Catalysis and Automotive Pollution Control (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1991).Google Scholar
15. Frost, J.C., Nature 334, 577580(1988).Google Scholar
16. Haruta, M., Tsubota, S., Kobayashi, T., Kageyma, H., Genet, M. J., Delmon, B., J. Catal. 144, 175192(1993).Google Scholar
17. Liu, W., Sarofim, A., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Appl. Catal., in press(1994).Google Scholar