Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:35:58.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trace Contamination Measurements Using Heavy Ion Backscattering Spectrometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J.A. Knapp
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
J.C. Banks
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
D.K. Brice
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Get access

Abstract

Heavy Ion Backscattering Spectrometry (HIBS) is a tool for measuring surface contamination at levels much lower than previously achievable with ion beam analyses. Many areas of materials research and development require very low levels of impurities, with advanced microelectronics as the best example. HIBS uses low-energy, heavy ions for analysis, taking advantage of the increased backscattering yield which can be obtained from high Z ion beams at low energy. Background due to increased yield from the substrate is eliminated by a thin carbon foil as part of the detector, with a thickness chosen to range out ions scattered from the substrate and allow only ions scattered from impurities heavier than the substrate to reach the detector. Our research system, using 150-200 keV N+ beams and a single time-of-flight detector optimized for large solid angle, has achieved a sensitivity ranging from ∼5×1010 atoms/cm2 for Fe to ∼1×109 atoms/cm for Au on Si, without preconcentration. A stand-alone HIBS prototype which we have developed for SEMATECH is expected to reach detection limits of -5×10 atoms/cm for Fe and -1×10 atoms/cm for Au on Si. In this paper we discuss in detail the factors which affect sensitivity for HIBS.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, for example, the proceedings of Microcontamination 94, Oct. 4-6, 1994.Google Scholar
2 Doyle, B.L., Knapp, J.A., and Buller, D.L., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B42, 295 (1989).Google Scholar
3 Knapp, J.A. and Doyle, B.L., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B45, 143 (1990).Google Scholar
4 Knapp, J.A. Banks, and J.C., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B79, 457 (1993).Google Scholar
5 Knapp, J.A., Banks, J.C., and Doyle, B.L., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B85, 20 (1994).Google Scholar
6 Knapp, J.A., Banks, J.C., and Doyle, B.L., Sandia National Laboratories internal report, SAND94-0391 (1994).Google Scholar
7 Knapp, J.A., Banks, J.C., and Diebold, A, C., Proceedings of Microcontamination 94, Sandia National Laboratories internal report, SAND94-0391 (1994).Google Scholar
8 Rutherford, E., Phil. Mag. 21, 669 (1911).Google Scholar
9 Darwin, C.G., Phil. Mag. 28, 499 (1914).Google Scholar
10 Lee, S.R. and Hart, R.R., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B79, 463 (1993).Google Scholar
11 Andersen, H.H.H., Besenbacher, F., Loftagerand, P. Möller, W., Phys. Rev. A21, 1891 (1980).Google Scholar
12 The detector design is of the same general configuration as a time-of-flight detector developed previously for high resolution ion beam analysis; details can be found in: Mendenhall, M.H. and Weiler, R.A., Nue. Inst. and Meth. B47, 193 (1990).Google Scholar
13 Weiler, R.A., Pedersen, D., Weiler, M.R., Arps, J.H., Banks, J.C. and Knapp, J.A., to be published.Google Scholar
14 TRIM computer code, J.F. Ziegler, IBM Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York; See also, Ziegler, J.F., Biersack, J.P. and Littmark, U., The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids, vol. 1 (Pegamon, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
15 Weiler, R.A., Arps, J.H., Pedersen, D. and Mendenhall, M.H., Nucl. Inst. and Meth., in press.Google Scholar
16 Weiler, R.A., to be published.Google Scholar
17 Brice, D.K., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B69, 349 (1992).Google Scholar
18 Brice, D.K., to be published.Google Scholar