Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:29:34.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Third Millennium B.C. Tin Processing Debris From Goltepe (Anatolia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Pamela Vandiver ,
K. Aslihan Yener  and
Leopold May
Pamela Vandiver
Affiliation:
Conservation Analytical Lab, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, USA
K. Aslihan Yener
Affiliation:
Conservation Analytical Lab, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, USA
Leopold May
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20064, USA
Get access

Abstract

Ceramic remains of fragmentary vessels, believed to be smelting crucibles based on microscopic field investigation, were analyzed using a variety of techniques in order identify the metal being processed and to reconstruct the ancient processing, especially ranges of composition, temperature, atmosphere, and the constraints on processing which each of these processing variables would have imposed. The identification of the metal being processed in the crucible surface residues and the slags provide data to resolve a dispute over the nature of the ancient metallurgical processing at Goltepe; gold and iron have been suggested as alternate metals but were not found. Intensive study of the ceramic and slag microstructure, composition and thermal history was required to establish the processing constraints which will be used to aid future replicative smelting experiments at the site.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 267: Symposium J – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology III , 1992 , 545
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Moorey, P.R.S., Materials and Manufacture in Ancient Mesopotamia:BAR Int'l 237 (1985) 17–20, 51-68, and E.S. Hedges, Tin and ItsAlloys, Arnold (London 1960).Google Scholar
2. Goodway, M., personal communication.Google Scholar
3. Yener, K.A., Ozbal, H., Kaptan, E., Pehlivan, A.N., Goodway, M., "Kestel: An Early Bronze Age Source of Tin in the Taurus Mountains,Turkey,” Science 244 (1989) 200-203.Google Scholar
4. Yener, K.A., Vandiver, P.B., “Tin Processing at Goltepe, an Early Bronze Age Site in Anatolia,” Am. Jour. Archaeology, in press; W.Hornyak et al., “TL Dating of a Crucible Fragment from an Early Tin Processing Site in Turkey,” in preparation.Google Scholar
5. Freestone, I.C., “Refractories in the Ancient and Preindustrial World,” in Kingery, W.D., ed., High-Technology Ceramics: Past, Presentand Future, III, A. Cer. S. (Westerville, OH, 1986 35-64, and I.C. Freestone, “Refractory Materials and their Procurement,” in Old WorldArchaeometallurgy, R. Maddin, ed., M.I.T. Press (Cambridge 1991) 151-162.Google Scholar
6. Hughes, C.J., Igneous Petrology, Elsevier (Amsterdam, 1982) 92–93.Google Scholar
7. Levin, E.M., Robbins, C.R. and McMurdie, H.F., Phase Diagrams forCeramists, I, A.Cer.S. (Westerville, OH, 1964) 181 (fig. 501).Google Scholar
9. Kingery, W.D. and Frierman, J.D., “The Firing Temperature of a Karanova Sherd and Inferences about South-east European Chalcolithic Refractory Technology,” Proc. Prehistoric Soc. 40 (1974) 204-205, and M.S. Tite et al., “Technological Studies of Ancient Ceramics,” in T.A.and S.F. Wertime, eds. Early Pyrotechnology (Washington, D.C., 1982) 61–72.Google Scholar
9. Clark-Monks, C. and Parker, J.M., Stones and Cord in Glass (Sheffield 1980) 95, 185; E.R. Begley, Guide to Refractory and Glass Reactions (Boston 1970) 101, and F.H. Norton, Refractories (New York 1968) 369;H.G. Bachmann, Identification of Slags from Archaeological Sites,Inst. of Archaeology Occ. Publ. 6 (London 1982) 27.Google Scholar
10. Tylecote, R.F., Early History of Metallurgy in Europe (London, 1987) and P.A. Wright, The Extractive Metallurgy of Tin (New York, 1966) 87–89.Google Scholar
11. Floyd, J.M., “The Physical Chemistry of Tin Smelting,” in Cigan, J.M., Mackay, T.S. and O'Keefe, T.J., eds., Lead-Zinc-Tin ‘80 (Washington, D.C., 1980) 508–531, and B.T.K. Barry and C.J. Thwaites,Tin and Its Alloys and Compounds, Halsted (New York 1983).Google Scholar
12. Earl, Bryan, “Tin Preparation and Smelting,” in Day, J. and Tylecote, R.F., eds., The Industrial Revolution in Metals, The Institute of Metals (London 1991) 37–83.Google Scholar
13. Crois, M.J. Errington de La, Les Mines d'Etain de Perak Presqu'Ilede Malacca (Paris 1882); L. Wray, Jr., Alluvial Tin Prospecting (Taiping, Malaya, 1893) 1-5; G.R. Lewis, A Study of the Medieval Tin Miners of Cornwall and Devon, Barton (Truro 1908) 10-19.Google Scholar
14. Parker, R.H., Mitchell, A.R. and Lai, F.H., “Reduction of Cassiterite Concentrated by Solid Carbon in Reverberatory Tin Smelting,” Trans.Instn. Min. Metall. (Sect. C: Mineral Process. Extr. Metall.) 9 (MayAug. 1990) C93–C99.Google Scholar
15. Cable, M., “Principles of Glass Melting,” in Uhlmann, D.R. and Kreidl, N.J., eds., Glass: Science and Technology, vol II, Academic Press (Orlando 1984) 19-21, and N.J. Kreidl, “Inorganic Glass-FormingSystems,” in D.R. Uhlmann and N.J. Kreidl, eds., Glass; Science and 569Technology, vol I, Academic Press (Orlando 1983) 151-153.Google Scholar
16. Mulfinger, H., J. A.Cer.S., 49 (1966) 462–467; M. Cable and M. Haroon, J. Glass Technol. 11 (1970) 48-53, L. Nemec, J. Glass Tech., 15 (1974) 153-161, L. Nemec, J. A.Cer.S. 69 (1977) 436-440; H. Verweij, J. A.Cer.S. 62 (1979) 450-455; L. Nemec, Jour. Glass Tech., 21 (1980) 134-144.Google Scholar