Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:16:12.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermomechanical stress in silicon on quartz wafer bonding and Smart Cut® process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Yu-Lin Chao
Affiliation:
Wafer bonding Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0300
Qin-Yi Tong
Affiliation:
Wafer bonding Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0300 Microelectronics Center, Research Triangle Institute, RTP, NC 27709
Ulrich M. Gösele
Affiliation:
Wafer bonding Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0300 Max-Plank Institute of Microstructure Physics, Weinberg 2, D-06120 Halle, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The thermal stress behavior of silicon/quartz bonded wafer pairs is examined. Sliding, debonding, and cracking are the observed mechanisms of relaxation. When the elastic energy due to the different thermal expansion coefficients of silicon and quartz exceeds the bonding energy, sliding will start and lead to a serrated curve on the curvature-versus-temperature graph. Finally, debonding will occur once the peeling stress exceeds the interface bonding strength. The debonded parts crack due to the overhang structure, and debonding-cracking processes continue during a further temperature increase. The stress behavior of the hydrogen-implantation induced layer splitting process (the so-called “Smart-Cut process”) of silicon/quartz pairs is also monitored in a stress measurement setup. It is observed that Smart-Cut process is a sudden process in agreement with the observations reported in the literature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Im, J. S., Sposili, R. S., MRS Bulletin, 39 (March 1996).Google Scholar
2. Bruel, M., Aspar, B., Maleville, C., Moriceau, H., Poumeyrol, T., Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Advanced Science and Technology of Silicon Materials, 214, (1996).Google Scholar
3. Chao, Y.-L., Master thesis, Duke University, N.C., 1998.Google Scholar
4. Lee, T.-H., Ph. D. thesis, Duke University, N.C., 1998.Google Scholar
5. Cha, G., Ph. D. thesis, Duke University, N.C., 1994.Google Scholar
6. Kopperschmidt, P., Kästner, G., Hesse, D., Zakharov, N. D., and Gösele, U., Appl. Phys. Lett., 70, (22), 2972 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Mirman, B. A., Knecht, S., IEEE Trans. On Comp. Hybrids, and Manuf. Tech., 13, 914 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Berthold, A., Vellekoop, M. J., Sensors and Actuators, A60, 208 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Grupen-Shemansky, M. E., Hawkins, G. W., and Liaw, H. M., Proc. 1st Int. Sym. Semicond. Wafer Bonding: Science, Technol. and Appl., The Electrochem. Soc. PV92–7, 132 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Tong, Q.-Y., Sholz, R., Gösele, U., Lee, T.-H., Huang, L.-J., Chao, Y.-L., Tan, T. Y., Appl. Phys. Lett., 72, (1), 49 (1998).Google Scholar
11. Huang, L.-J., Tong, Q.-Y., Chao, Y.-L., Lee, T.-H., Martini, T., and Gösele, U., Appl. Phys. Lett., 74, (7), 982 (1999).Google Scholar