Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T11:42:50.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermodynamic Interpretations of Chemical Analyses of Unsaturated Zone Water From Yucca Mountain, Nevada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Lauren Browning
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Rd., San Antonio, Texas 78238USA
William M. Murphy
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Rd., San Antonio, Texas 78238USA
Bret W. Leslie
Affiliation:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555
Wiliam L. Dam
Affiliation:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555
Get access

Abstract

Analytical pore water compositions from Yucca Mountain were evaluated for internal thermodynamic consistency. Significant ionic charge imbalances, unequilibrated aqueous speciation relationships, and erratic variability with depth in some species concentrations were found. Thermodynamic consistency was restored by introducing measured CO2 gas pressure as a constraint, imposing equilibrium aqueous speciation, and adjusting pH to achieve charge balance. Reinterpreted water chemistry data were used to evaluate and interpret vertical and lateral variations in water chemistry, differences between unsaturated zone pore and perched water compositions, and water-rock equilibria.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Gray, W. J., Leider, H. R., and Steward, S. A., PNL-10540m, 1995.Google Scholar
2 Yang, I. C., Rattray, G. W., and Yu, P., U.S.G.S. WRIR 96-4058, 1996.Google Scholar
3 Yang, I. C., Yu, P., Rattray, G. W., Ferarese, J. S., and Ryan, R. N., U.S.G.S. WRIR 98-4132, 1998.Google Scholar
4 J. A. Apps LBNL-40376, UC-814, 1997.Google Scholar
5 Harrar, J. E., Carley, J. F., Isherwood, W. F., and Raber, E., UCID-21867, NNA.1910131.0274, 1990.Google Scholar
6 Wolery, T. J., UCRL-MA-1 10662- Pt.3, 1992.Google Scholar
7 Thorstenson, D. C., Weeks, E. P., Haas, H. H., and J. C. Woodward in Nuclear Waste Isolation in the Unsaturated Zone (Focus '89 Proc. Las Vegas, NV, 1990) pp. 256270.Google Scholar
8 Yang, I. C., Turner, A. K., Sayre, T. M., and Parviz, M., U.S.G.S. WRLR 88–4189, 1988.Google Scholar
9 Sass and Lachenbruch (1982) USGS-OFR-82-973.Google Scholar
10 Kerrisk, J. F., LA-10929-MS, 1987.Google Scholar
11 Murphy, W. M., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII, Murakami, T. and Ewing, R. C. (Ed.). Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 353, pp. 419426, 1995.Google Scholar
12 Bish, D. L. and Chipera, S. J., LA-11497-MS, 1989 Google Scholar
13 Broxton, D. E., Bish, D. L., and Warren, R. G., Clays and Clay Min. 35 (2), 89 (1987).Google Scholar
14 Kerrisk, J. F., LA-10560-MS, 1983.Google Scholar
15 Murphy, W. M. (Focus '93 Proc. Am. Nuc. Soc., La Grange Park, IL, 1994), p. 115121.Google Scholar
16 Pabalan, R. T. and Bertetti, F. P., J. Soln. Chem. 28 (4), 367 (1999).Google Scholar
17 Browning, L., Murphy, W. M., and Hughson, D., EOS Sup. 80 (17), Spring AGU, 1999.Google Scholar