Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:47:11.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal Stability of Ti/Pt/Au Non-Alloyed Ohmic Contacts on InN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

F. Ren
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974, U.S.A.
C. R. Abernathy
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974, U.S.A.
S. J. Pearton
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974, U.S.A.
P. W. Wisk
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Extremely low contact resistance of non-alloyed Ti/Pt/Au metallization on n-type InN is demonstrated. The contacts were annealed at different temperatures up to 420 °C to investigate their thermal stability. A low contact resistivity of 1.8 x 10-7 ohm-cm2 was measured at room temperature using the transmission line method. This was due to the extremely high doping level (5 x 1020 cm-3) in the InN. After 300 °C annealing, the contact resistivity increased to 2.4 x 10-7 ohm-cm2- For 360 °C annealing, the contact morphology showed some degradation, but the contact resistivity was almost the same as at 300 °C. There was serious degradation of the contacts after 420 °C annealing. The morphology became very rough, and the contact and sheet resistances increased by factors of 3-5 times. This degradation is believed due to the decomposition of the InN film. The contact resistivities between n-type epitaxial GaAs and InN were also investigated, and showed values around 10-4 ohm-cm2.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Davis, R. F., Proc. IEEE, 79, 702 (1991).Google Scholar
2 Strite, S. and Morkoc, H., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 10, 1237 (1992)Google Scholar
3 Abernathy, C. R., Pearton, S. J., Ren, F. and Wisk, P. W., J. Vac. Sci. Tech., 11, 179 (1993)Google Scholar
4 Tansley, T. L. and Foley, C. P., Electron. Lett.,20, 1066 (1984).Google Scholar
5 Sullivan, B. T. and Parsons, R. R., J. Appl. Phys., 64, 4144 (1988).Google Scholar
6 Kubota, K., Kobayashi, Y. and Fujimoto, K., J. Appl. Phys., 66, 2984 (1989).Google Scholar
7 Hovel, H. J. and Cuomo, J. J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 20, 71 (1972)Google Scholar
8 Kistenmacher, T. J., Ecelberger, S. A. and Bryden, W. A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 242, 441 (1992).Google Scholar
9 Khan, M. A., Kuznia, J. N., Bahattarai, A. R. and Olson, D. T., Appl. Phys. Lett., 62, 1786 (1993).Google Scholar
10 Pearton, S. J., Abernathy, C. R., Ren, F., Lothian, J. R., Wisk, P. W. and Katz, A., J. Vac. Sci. Tech., vol. 11, 1772 (1993).Google Scholar
11 Foresi, J. S. and Moustakas, T. D., Appl. Phys. Lett., 62, 2859 (1993).Google Scholar
12 Berger, H. H., J. Electrochem. Soc., 119, 507(1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Ren, F., Kuo, J. M., Pearton, S. J., Fullowan, T. R. and Lothian, J. R., J. elec. Mat., 21, 243(1992).Google Scholar