Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:31:01.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theoretical Modeling of Chemical Vapor Deposition of Silicon Carbide in a Hot Wall Reactor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Feng Gao
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Mail Box #12, Cincinnati, OH 45221
Ray Y. Lin
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Mail Box #12, Cincinnati, OH 45221
Get access

Abstract

A theoretical model, which describes the coupled hydrodynamics, mass transport and chemical reaction, has been developed to simulate chemical vapor deposition (CVD) of silicon carbide (SiC) from gas mixture of methyltrichlorosilane (MTS), hydrogen and argon in a hot wall reactor. In the model analysis, the governing equations were developed in the cylindrical coordinate, and solved numerically by using a finite difference method. A kinetic rate expression of CVD-SiC deposition from the gas mixture was obtained from this study. The deposition rate has an Arrhenius-type dependence on the deposition temperature and is first order with respect to the MTS concentration. Estimated activation energy is 254 kJ/mol. Predicted deposition rate profiles by the model analysis incorporated with the obtained kinetic rate expression showed excellent agreement with experimental data over a variety of applied deposition conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cheng, D. J., et al. , J. Electrochem. Soc. 134 (12), 3145 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Motojima, S., Yagi, H. and Iwamori, N., J. Mater. Sci. Let. 5, 13 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chin, J., Gantzel, P. K. and Hudson, R. G., Thin Solid Films, 40, 57 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Cagliostro, D. E. and Riccitiello, S. R., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 76 (1), 39 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Kobayashi, F., Kawa, K. I. and Iwamoto, K., J. Crys. Growth, 28, 395 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Shinozaki, S. S. and Sato, H., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 61 (9/10), 425 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Koh, J. H. and Woo, S. I., J. Electrochem. Soc. 137 (7), 2215 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Allendorf, M. D. and Kee, R. J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 138 (3), 841 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Gupte, S. M. and Tsamopoulos, J. A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 136 (2), 555 (1989); 137 (5) 1626 (1990); 137 (11), 3675 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Melkote, R. R. and Jensen, K. F., Proc, 11th, Int. Conf. on CVD, 506 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Brennfleck, K. et al. , Proc. 9th. Int. Conf. on CVD, 649 (1984).Google Scholar
12. Fedou, R., Langlais, F. and Naslain, R., Proc. Ilth. Int. Conf. on CVD, 513 (1990).Google Scholar
13. Fitzer, E., Hegen, D. and Strohmeier, H., Proc. 9th. Int. Conf. on CVD, 525 (1984).Google Scholar