Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T20:06:31.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theoretical and Experimental Study of Tip Electronic Structure in Scanning Tunneling Microscope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

HeeSung Choi ,
Min Huang ,
Joshua B Ballard ,
Kevin T He ,
Scott W Schmucker ,
Joseph N Lyding ,
John N Randall  and
Kyeongjae Cho
HeeSung Choi
Affiliation:
hschoi@utdallas.eduhschoi07@gmail.com, University of Texas at Dallas, Department of Materials Science & Engineering and Department of Physics, Richardson, Texas, United States
Min Huang
Affiliation:
minhuang@utdallas.edu, University of Texas at Dallas, Department of Materials Science & Engineering and Department of Physics, Richardson, Texas, United States
Joshua B Ballard
Affiliation:
jballard@zyvexlabs.com, Zyvex Labs, Richardson, Texas, United States
Kevin T He
Affiliation:
kevinhe@uiuc.edu, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Bechman Institute, Urbana, Illinois, United States
Scott W Schmucker
Affiliation:
sschmuc2@uiuc.edu, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Bechman Institute, Urbana, Illinois, United States
Joseph N Lyding
Affiliation:
lyding@uiuc.edu, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Bechman Institute, Urbana, Illinois, United States
John N Randall
Affiliation:
jrandall@zyvexlabs.com, Zyvex Labs, Richardson, Texas, United States
Kyeongjae Cho
Affiliation:
kjcho@utdallas.edu, University of Texas at Dallas, Department of Materials Science & Engineering and Department of Physics, Richardson, Texas, United States
Get access

Abstract

The atomic and electronic structures of pyramidal model STM tips of transition metals (W, Rh, Pd, Ir and Pt) were investigated using density functional theory (DFT) method. The calculated density of states show that d electrons of the apex atoms in the M4 (M = W, Rh, Pd, Ir, Pt) model tips behave differently near the Fermi level, with the dz2 state being dominant only for W tip. The electronic structures of pyramid structures of W and Pd single-atom tips with larger sizes are studied and compared. The density of states of Pd apex atom and W apex atom show different occupation of d-bands leading to asymmetric density of states for Pd tip. The asymmetric tunneling currents measured by W and Pt-Ir STM tips are explained by the calculated electronic structures of W and Pd model tips.

Keywords

scanning tunneling microscopy (STM)simulationelectronic structure
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1177: Symposium Z – Computational Nanoscience–How to Exploit Synergy between Predictive Simulations and Experiment , 2009 , 1177-Z06-03
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tersoff, J. and Hamann, D.R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1998 (1983).Google Scholar
2 Tersoff, J. and Hamann, D.R., Phys. Rev. B. 31, 805 (1985).Google Scholar
3 Chen, C. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 448 (1990).Google Scholar
4 Chen, C. J., Phys. Rev. B 42, 8841 (1990).Google Scholar
5 Wintterlin, J. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 59 (1989).Google Scholar
6 Cho, K. and Joannopoulos, J. D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1387–1390 (1993).Google Scholar
7 Cho, K. and Joannopoulos, J. D., Scanning Microscopy 9, 381–386 (1995).Google Scholar
8When atomic resolution STM images are obtained, the apex of the STM is expected to have a single atom. The main difference of SATs is that the apex structure of an SAT is well defined and can be reproduced.Google Scholar
9 Fu, Tsu-Yi et al., Phys. Rev. B. 64, 113401 (2001).Google Scholar
10 Cho, K. and Joannopoulos, J. D., Surf. Sci. 328, 320–324 (1995).Google Scholar
11 Cho, K. and Joannopoulos, J. D., Phys. Rev. B 53, 4553–4556 (1996).Google Scholar
12 Cho, K. and Joannopoulos, J. D., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 35, 3714–3718 (1996).Google Scholar
13 Hofer, W. A. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 236104 (2001).Google Scholar
14 Kuo, Hong-Shi et al., Nano Lett., 4, 2379 (2004).Google Scholar
15 Kuo, Hong-Shi et al., e-J.Surf.Sci.Nanotech. Vol 4, 233 (2006).Google Scholar
16 Kuo, Hong-Shi et al., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. Vol 45, 8972 (2006).Google Scholar
17 Kresse, G. and Hafner, J., Phys. Rev. B. 47, 558 (1993).Google Scholar
18 Kresse, G. and Furthmüller, J., Phys. Rev. B. 54, 11169 (1996).Google Scholar
19 Kresse, G. and Hafner, J., J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 6, 8245 (1994).Google Scholar
20J.Lyding, W. et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59, 1897 (1988).Google Scholar
21 Brockenbrough, R.T. and Lyding, J.W., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 2225 (1993).Google Scholar