Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T01:09:12.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temperature Effects on Internal Stress in Molybdenum Thin Films on Single-Crystal Silicon Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Jiann-Ruey Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300, (Taiwan)
Ching-Hung Ho
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300, (Taiwan)
Get access

Abstract

Molybdenum thin films were deposited with an electron beam gun onto (100)- oriented silicon substrates. The samples were then annealed in vacuum, and the internal stresses in the molybdenum thin films were studied as functions both of the annealing temperature and of the substrate temperature during deposition. Silicide formation and the film thickness after annealing were monitored by the Rutherford backscattering spectrometry technique, and the stress was determined from the substrate curvature which was measured from Newton's ring interference fringes. It was found that, when the substrate temperature was kept at 400°C during deposition, MoSi2 was formed after annealing at temperatures above 500 °C. This MoSi2 exhibited large tensile stresses of about 2 × 1010 dyn cm−2 for annealing above 700 °C, whereas at the lower annealing temperature of 500 °C the stresses were compressive. No detectable silicides were observed when the substrates were kept at temperatures below 150 °C. The Mo-Si film stresses were tensile for substrates kept at room temperature during deposition and compressive for substrates kept at 150 °C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Klokholm, E. and Berry, B. S., J. Electrochem. Soc., 115 (1968) 823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Jaccodine, R. J. and Schlegel, W. A., J. Appl. Phys., 37 (1966) 2429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Thornton, J. A. and Hoffman, D. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 14 (1977) 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Hoffman, D. W. and Thornton, J. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 17(1980) 380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Hoffman, D. W. and Thornton, J. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 16 (1979) 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Chaudhari, P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 9 (1972) 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Murarka, S. P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 17 (1980) 775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Holmwood, R. A. and Glang, R., J. Electrochem. Soc., 112 (1965) 827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Oikawa, H. and Nakajima, Y., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 14 (1977) 1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Campbeil, D. S., in Maissel, L. I. and Glang, R. (eds.), Handbook of Thin Film Technology, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970, Chap. 12.Google Scholar
11 Finegan, J. D. and Hoffman, R. W., in Preuss, L. E. (ed.), Trans. 8th Natl. Vacuum Symp. and 2nd Int. Congr. on Vacuum Science and Technology, Washington, DC, October 16–19, 1961, Vol. 2, Pergamon, New York, 1962, p. 935.Google Scholar
12 Kinbara, A. and Haraki, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 4 (1965) 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Glang, R., Holmwood, R. A. and Rosenfeld, R. L., Rev. Sci. Instrum., 36 (1965) 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Rozgonyi, G. A. and Ciesielka, T. J., Rev. Sci. Instrum., 44 (1973) 1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Halliday, D. and Resnick, R., Physics, Wiley, New York, revised edn., 1966.Google Scholar
16 Hoffman, R. W., Phys. Thin Films, 3 (1966) 211.Google Scholar
17 Chopra, K. L., Thin Film Phenomena, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969, p. 266.Google Scholar
18 Stoney, G. G., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 82 (1909) 172.Google Scholar
19 Brantley, W. A., J. Appl. Phys., 44 (1973) 534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar