Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:47:09.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface Structure - Catalytic Function in Nanophase Gold Catalysts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Chien Sze ,
Erdogan Gulari  and
B.G. Demczyk
Chien Sze
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Erdogan Gulari
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
B.G. Demczyk
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Get access

Abstract

Catalysts consisting of ultra-fine gold particles supported on iron oxide have been synthesized by the coprecipitation method. Subsequent to preparation, each sample was heat treated in air at four different temperatures, ranging from 473 K to 773 K. Steady state carbon monoxide oxidation was carried out over each sample. Upon extended reaction, catalyst deactivation took place over three of the catalysts whose respective surface compositions (e.g., gold to iron atomic ratio) were altered appreciably from their initial state. Surface structure analyses performed on all the unreacted catalysts have revealed variations in physical properties (e.g., degree of crystallinity and particle size). In addition, lattice parameters of gold were observed to increase up to 20 % from the bulk value. In contrast, XPS showed both gold and iron to be in essentially the same chemical states for all catalysts, irrespective of heat treatment temperatures. The importance of surface sensitive parameters to catalytic function are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 286: Symposium J – Nanophase and Nanocomposite Materials , 1992 , 143
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Noordally, E. and Richmond, J.R. in Low TemWrature CO Oxidation Catalysts for Long-Life CO2 Lasers, edited by Schryer, D.R. and Hoflund, G.B. (NASA Conference Publication 3076, Hampton, VA, 1989), pp. 387–402.Google Scholar
2. Upchurch, B.T., Kielin, E.J., and Miller, I.M. in Low Temperature CO Oxidation Catalysts for Long-Life CO2 Laers, edited by Schryer, D.R. and Hoflund, G.B. (NASA Conference Publication 3076, Hampton, VA, 1989), pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
3. Stark, D.S., Crocker, A., and Steward, G.J., J. Phys. E. Sci. Instrum. 16, 158 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Stark, D.S. and Harris, M.R., J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 16, 492 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Kobayashi, T., Haruta, M., Sano, H., and Nakane, M., Sensors and Actuators 13, 339 (1988).Google Scholar
6. Kobayashi, T., Haruta, M., and Sano, H., Chem. Express 4 (4), 217–220 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Harrison, P.G. and Willett, M.J., Nature 332, 337 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Xu, C., Tamaki, J., Miura, N., and Yamazoe, N., Chem. Lett. 1990, 441.Google Scholar
9. Collins, M.F. in Closed-Cycle. Frequency-Stable CO2 Laser Technology, edited by Batten, C.E., Miller, I.M., Wood, G.M. Jr., and Willetts, D.V. (NASA Conference Publication 2456, Hampton, VA, 1986), pp. 153–163.Google Scholar
10. Brittan, M.I., Bliss, H., and Walker, C.A., AIChE 16 (2), 305–314 (1970).Google Scholar
11. Schryer, D.R., Upchurch, B.T., Norman, J.D. Van, Brown, K.G., and Schryer, J., J., J. Catal. 122, 193 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Schryer, D.R., Upchurch, B.T., Sidney, B.D., Brown, K.G., Hoflund, G.B., Herz, R.K., J. Catal. 130, 314 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Gardner, S.D., Hoflund, G.B., Schryer, D.R., Schryer, J., Upchurch, B.T., and Kielin, E.J., Langmuir 7, 2135 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Gardner, S.D., Hoflund, G.B., Davidson, M.R., Laitinen, H.A., Schryer, D.R., and Upchurch, B.T., Langmuir 7, 2140 (1991).Google Scholar
15. Gardner, S.D., Hoflund, G.B., Schryer, D.R., and Upchurch, B.T., J. Phys. Chem. 95, 835 (1991).Google Scholar
16. Haruta, M., Kobayashi, T., Sano, H., and Yamada, N., Chem. Lett. 1987, 405.Google Scholar
17. Haruta, M., Yamada, N., Kobayashi, T., and lijima, S., J. Catal. 115, 301 (1989).Google Scholar
18. Cha, D.Y. and Parravano, G., J. Catal. 18, 200 (1970).Google Scholar
19. Zhou, X., Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1987.Google Scholar
20. Sze, C. and Gulari, E., presented at the 1992 AIChE Fall National Meeting, Miami Beach, FL, 1992.Google Scholar
21. Wagner, C.D., Gale, L.H., and Raymond, R.H., Anal. Chem. 51, 466 (1979).Google Scholar
22. Reed-Hill, R.E., Physical Metallurgy Principles, 2nd ed. (Van Nostrand Publishers, New York, 1973), p. 300.Google Scholar
23. Cowley, J., Diffraction Pbysji, 2nd rev. ed. (North Holland Physics Publishers, New York, 1984), pp. 35–49.Google Scholar
24. Demczyk, B.G., in Microstructure of Materials, edited by Krishnan, K., in press.Google Scholar