Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T15:23:02.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface features and alteration products of natural zirconolite leached in silica-saturated solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

K. B. Helean ,
W. Lutze  and
R. C. Ewing
K. B. Helean
Affiliation:
Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87501
W. Lutze
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical & Nuclear Engineering, Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87501
R. C. Ewing
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering & Radiological Sciences, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Get access

Abstract

Zirconolite, CaZrTi2O7, has been proposed as an immobilization phase for the disposition of excess weapons Pu and other actinides (e.g., 235U). Due to actinide incorporation, zirconolite is expected to sustain α-decay event damage and become aperiodic (=metamict) over time. The leaching behavior of metamict zirconolite is, therefore, of interest. Because groundwater in a variety of geologic settings contains up to saturation concentrations of silicic acid, H4SiO4, silica-saturated solutions were used. Natural, metamict (> 1026 α-decay events per mn3) zirconolite grains, nominally (Ca, Th)ZrTi2O7 (U.S. National Museum sample #B20392, Walawada, Sri Lanka) were leached in two separate silica-saturated solutions at 150 °C for 60 days. Surface features and alteration products were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and quantitative energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Secondary electron (SEI) images of the surfaces of the leached grains from both experiments revealed pores, probably due to the accumulation of He-bubbles from α-decay events, of approximately 4% as estimated by contrast enhanced gray-scale analysis of digital images. SEI of the zirconolite surface before leaching showed a smooth surface. The pores not only increase the surface area of the metamict zirconolite, but also act as nucleation sites for alteration phase growth. One experiment was conducted in a silica-saturated solution containing approximately 100 ppm P as measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). The main alteration phase was euhedral, monoclinic cheralite, (Th, Ca, Ce)(P, Si)O4 (monazite group). The second experiment was conducted in the absence of P. The main alteration phase was subhedral cubic thorianite, ThO2.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 556: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII , 1999 , 157
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Ringwood, A. E., Kesson, S. E., Reeve, K. D., Levins, D. M. and Ramm, E. J. in Radioactive Waste Formsfbr the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R. C. (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1988) pp. 233–334.Google Scholar
[2] Ewing, R. C., Weber, W. J. and Lutze, W. in Disposal of Weapons Plutonium, edited by Mertz, E. R. and Walter, C. E. (Klumer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 1996) pp. 65–83.Google Scholar
[3] Ewing, R. C. and Headley, T. J., J. Nucl. Mater., 119, 102 (1983).Google Scholar
[4] Lumpkin, G. R., Ewing, R. C., Chakoumakos, B. C., Greegor, R. B., Lytle, F. W., Foltyn, e. M., Clinard, F. W. Jr., Boatner, L. A. and Abraham, M. M., J.Mater. Res. 1 (4), 564 (1986).Google Scholar
[5] Giére, R., Guggenheim, R., Duggelin, M., Mathys, D., Williams, C. T., Lumpkin, G. R., Smith, K. L., Blackford, M. G., Hart, K. P. and McGlinn, P. J., ICEM 13-Paris, 1269 (1994).Google Scholar
[6] Oversby, V. M. and Ringwood, A. E., Rad. Waste Management, 1, 289 (1981).Google Scholar
[7] Giére, R. and Williams, C. T. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 112, 83 (1992).Google Scholar
[8] Hough, A. and Marples, J. A. C., The Radiation Stability of Synroc: Final Report, AEA Tech., Report AEA-FS-0201 (H).Google Scholar
[9] Lumpkin, G. R., Smith, K. L., Hart, K. P., McGlinn, P., Bartlett, J., Lam, P. and Blackford, M. G., XIIth International Congress for Electron Microscopy, San Francisco Press, 1990, 47–48.Google Scholar
[10] Wald, J. W. and Weber, W. J. in Advances in Ceramic, vol.8, Nuclear Waste Management, edited by Wicks, G. G. and Ross, W.A. (American Ceramic Society, Colombus, 1984) pp. 71–75.Google Scholar
[11] Ewing, R. C., Weber, W. J. and Clinard, F. W. Jr., Prog. In Nucl. Energy: An Int'l Rev. J. 29(2), 63 (1995).Google Scholar
[12] Headley, T. J., Ewing, R. C. and Haaker, R. F., Nature, 293,449.Google Scholar
[13] Sinclair, W. and Ringwood, A. E., Geochem. J., 15, 229 (1981).Google Scholar
[14] Lumpkin, G. R., Smith, K. L. and Blackford, M. G. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII, edited by Murakami, T. and Ewing, R. C. (Elsevier Scientific Publishers, New York, 1995) pp. 855–862.Google Scholar
[15] Lumpkin, G. R., Smith, K. L., Blackford, M. G., Hart, K. P., McGlinn, P. J., Giére, R. and Williams, C. T.. Proceedings of the 9 th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference. National Conference Publication No. 94/6 (1994).Google Scholar