Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:00:30.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface Derivatization of Nanocrystalline CdSe Semiconductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J.-K. Lee ,
M. Kuno  and
M. G. Bawendi
J.-K. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
M. Kuno
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
M. G. Bawendi
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Get access

Abstract

CdSe quantum dots (QDs) with several different ligands were prepared by ligand exchange reactions of trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO)/trioctylphosphine selenide (TOPSe) passivated QDs with an excess of new ligands, such as pyridine, 4-picoline, thiophenol, 4-(trifluoromethyl)-thiophenol, and tris(2-ethylhexyl)phosphate. We find that 85–90% of ligands passivating the surface of the QDs are the newly introduced capping species and 10–15% are native TOPO/TOPSe ligands, reflecting the incomplete exchange of the QD surface. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) and quantitative proton NMR measurements show that on average only 30% of surface cadmium atoms are passivated by TOPO/TOPSe. Approximately 1/3 of these native ligands occupy sites too strongly bound to be replaced by ligand exchange reactions.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 452 , 1996 , 323
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Dance, I.G., Choy, A., and Scudder, M.L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 6285 (1984).Google Scholar
[2]Steigerwald, M.L. and Brus, L.E., Ace. Chem. Res. 23, 183 (1990).Google Scholar
[3]Schmid, G., Chem. Rev. 92, 1709 (1992).Google Scholar
[4]Murray, C.B., Norris, D.J., and Bawendi, M.G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 8706 (1993).Google Scholar
[5]Bowen Katari, J.E., Colvin, V.L., and Alivisatos, A.P., J. Phys. Chem. 98, 4109 (1994).Google Scholar
[6]Koloskt, M., Vialle, J., and Cotel, T., J. of Chromatogr. 299, 436 (1984).Google Scholar
[7]Becerra, L.R., Murray, C.B., Griffin, R.G., and Bawendi, M.G., J. Chem. Phys. 100, 3297 (1994).Google Scholar
[8]Marcus, M.A., Brus, L.E., Murray, C.B., Bawendi, M.G., Prasad, A., and Alivisatos, A.P., Nanostruc. Mater. 1, 323 (1992).Google Scholar
[9]Sachleben, J.R., Wooten, E.W., Emsley, L., Pines, A., Colvin, V.L., and Alivisatos, A.P., Chem. Phys. Lett. 198, 431 (1992).Google Scholar
[10]Dean, P.A.W. and Hughes, M.K., Can. J. Chem. 58, 180 (1980)Google Scholar
[11]Maciel, G.E. and James, R.V., Inorg. Chem. 3, 1650 (1964).Google Scholar