Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T23:13:49.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Substrate Temperature Dependence of the Optical and Electronic Properties of Glow Discharge Produced a-Ge:H

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Yuan- Min Li
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
Warren A. Turner
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
Choochon Lee
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
William Paul
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
Get access

Abstract

Glow discharge a-Ge:H films produced at substrate temperatures (Tδ) between 50°C and 350°C, with and without a top a-Si:H capping layer, have been studied. The uncapped samples produced at Tδ < 250°C suffer severe post-deposition atmospheric contamination, resulting in orders of magnitude of unstable increase in both the photoresponse and dark conductivity. The capped samples, which have very much reduced immediate post-deposition contamination, show only small increases in the efficiency-mobility-lifetime product (ŋμτ) with increasing Tδ. This contrasts with the results of earlier similar studies on uncapped samples, which showed a peak in either the photoconductivity1 or the ratio of photoconductivity to dark conductivity2 for 150°C < Tδ < 2000C. We have also observed a decrease in the bandgap, a narrowing of the band-tails, an increase in the index of refraction, and a reduction of hydrogen content of the films with increasing Tδ.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Haku, H., Sayama, K., Matsuoka, T., Tsuda, S., Nakano, S., and Kuwano, K., presented at the 35th Spring Meeting of the Japanese Society of Applied Physics and Related Societies, 1988 (Extended Abstracts 30p–ZK–2).Google Scholar
2. Payson, J.S. and Ross, R.C., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 77&78, 579 (1985).Google Scholar
3. See for instance, Mackenzie, K.D., Burnett, J.H., Eggert, J.R., Li, Y.-M., and Paul, W., Phys. Rev. B 38(9), 6120 (1988), and the many references therein.Google Scholar
4. Mackenzie, K.D., Eggert, J.R., Leopold, D.J., Li, Y.-M., Lin, S., and Paul, W., Phys. Rev. B 31(4), 2198 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Ross, R.C., Chao, S.S., Tyler, J.E., Czubatyj, W., and Lucovsky, G., J.Vac.Sci.Technol. A 3(3), 958 (1985).Google Scholar
6. Turner, W.A., Jones, S.J., Lee, C., Lee, S.M., Li, Y.-M., and Paul, W., results presented at MRS Spring Meeting (1989), to be published in Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc.. No major effect on the optical and electrical properties of a-Ge:H of diluting GeH4 with H2 in the gas phase has been found, although structural changes have been observed.Google Scholar
7. Jones, S.J., Lee, S.M., Turner, W.A., and Paul, W., MRS Spring Meeting (1989) at San Diego, to be published in Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc..Google Scholar
8. Freeman, E.C. and Paul, W., Phys. Rev. B 20(2), 716 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Colthup, N.B., Dale, L.H., and Wiberly, S.E., Introduction IQ Infrared and Raman Sprctroscopy, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1975), p. 329342.Google Scholar
10. Connell, G.A.N. and Pawlik, J.R., Phys.Rev.B 13(2), 787 (1976).Google Scholar
11. Moustakas, T.D. and Paul, W., Phys. Rev. B 16(4), 1564 (1977).Google Scholar