Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T16:27:59.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sub-Nanometer Microscopy the Easy Way: An Underutilzed Tool for Reliability Assurance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Doug Hamilton
Affiliation:
Charles Evans & Associates, 301 Chesapeake Drive, Redwood City, CA 94063
C. Colvard
Affiliation:
Charles Evans & Associates, 301 Chesapeake Drive, Redwood City, CA 94063
Get access

Abstract

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is a frequently used tool for establishing reliability where potential causes of failure are related to structural aspects that show up on a submicron scale. Conventional SEMs, however, even those equipped with field emission sources, can provide high-quality photomicrographs only up to a magnification of about 100,000×. For many purposes greater resolution (several nanometers or below) is required, in which case the usual alternative is to turn to transmission electron microscopy (TEM), in spite of the laborious sample preparation required and limited plan-view images obtained. We describe here an underutilized alternative to TEM for many applications. The in-lens field emission SEM (ILFESEM) can provide pictures above 500,000× magnification with sub-nanometer resolution, with the simple sample preparation and surface viewing advantages of the SEM. Magnification in this range is necessary to verify modern day tolerances on surface morphology and roughness, oxide and thin film structure, thickness, and step coverage, and pore sizes in adhesion layers or diffusion membranes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wells, O.C., Scanning Electron Microscopy (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
2. Nagatani, T., Saito, S., Sato, M., and Yamada, M., Scanning Microscopy 1 901 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Peters, K-R., in Microbeam Analysis - 1984, ed. by Romig, A.D. Jr., and Goldstein, J.I. (San Francisco Press, San Francisco, 1984) p. 77.Google Scholar
4. Peters, K.-R., J. Microsc. 142 25 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar