Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:29:03.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study of Silicon Incorporation in GaAs Movpe Layers Grown With Tertiarybutylarsine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

J.M. Redwing
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Madison, WI 53706
T.F. Kuech
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Madison, WI 53706
H. Simka
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Cambridge, MA 02139
K.F. Jensen
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Cambridge, MA 02139
Get access

Abstract

MOVPE growth experiments have been used to evaluate the role of gas phase and surface chemistry in the silicon doping of GaAs films grown using SiH4 and Si2H6 dopant sources and tertiarybutylarsine (t-C4H9AsH2 or TBAs) as the Group V source. The use of TBAs with SiH4 results in a greater Si doping efficiency and weaker dependence on growth temperature than is typically observed with AsH3. Gas phase pyrolysis studies combined with reactor residence time experiments indicate that heterogeneous chemistry is responsible for this enhanced Si doping process. TBAs has much less of an effect on Si incorporation from Si2H6, a doping process controlled by homogeneous Si2H6 chemistry. Increased Si doping from Si2H6 with TBAs can be attributed to contributions from the enhanced doping efficiency of SiH4, a product of Si2H6 decomposition. The influence of TBAs on SiH4 doping chemistry was found to improve the doping uniformity of GaAs films grown in our reactor, from +/-12% for films grown with AsH3to +/-5% for TBAs-based material.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

1. Haacke, G., Watkins, S.P., Burkhard, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 478 (1990)Google Scholar
2. Lum, R.M., Klingert, J.K. and Lamont, M.G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 284 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Watkins, S.P. and Haacke, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 2263 (1991)Google Scholar
4. Hobson, W.S., Pearton, S.J., Kozuch, D.M. and Stavola, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 3259 (1992)Google Scholar
5. Serreze, H.B., Baumann, J.A., Bunz, L., Schachter, R. and Esman, R.D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 2532(1989)Google Scholar
6. Lum, R.M., Klingert, J.K. and Stevie, F.A., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 6507 (1990)Google Scholar
7. Veuhoff, E., Kuech, T.F. and Meyerson, B.S., J. Electrochem. Soc., 132, 1958 (1985)Google Scholar
8. Moffat, H.K., Kuech, T.F., Jensen, K.F. and Wang, P.J., J. Crystal Growth 93, 594 (1988)Google Scholar
9. Meyerson, B.S., Scott, B.A. and Tsui, R., Chemtronics 1, 151 (1986)Google Scholar
10. Kikkawa, T., Tanaka, H. and Komeno, J., J. Electron. Mater. 21, 305 (1992)Google Scholar
11. Chichibu, S., Iwai, A., Matsumoto, S. and Higuchi, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 489 (1992)Google Scholar
12. Lum, R.M. and Klingert, J.K., J. Appl. Phys. 66, 3820 (1989)Google Scholar
13. Redwing, J.M., Kuech, T.F., Saulys, D. and Gaines, D.F., presented at the 1993 EMC Conference, Santa Barbara, CA, 1993 (to be published in J. Crystal Growth)Google Scholar
14. Bass, S.J., J. Crystal Growth 47, 613 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Lee, P.W., Omstead, T.R., McKenna, D.R. and Jensen, K.F., J. Crystal Growth 93, 134 (1988)Google Scholar
16. Larsen, C.A., Buchan, N.I., Li, S.H. and Stringfellow, G.B., J. Crystal Growth 94, 663 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Solomon, P.M., Proc. IEEE 70, 489 (1982)Google Scholar