Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:06:25.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structure and Electrical Properties of Cu/Ge Ohmic Contacts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

S. Oktyabrsky
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7916.
M. O. Aboelfotoh
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7916.
J. Narayan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7916.
Get access

Abstract

Chemistry, crystal structure, interfacial microstructure and electrical characteristics of novel Cu-Ge alloyed ohmic contacts to n-type GaAs with a very low specific contact resistivity ((4–6)×10−7 Ω·cm2 for n∼1×1017 cm−3) were investigated by various methods. The Cu-Ge alloys with a wide range of Ge concentration, from 15 to 40 at %, were prepared by depositing sequentially Cu and Ge layers (or vise versa) onto GaAs substrates at room temperature followed by annealing at 400°C. It is shown that Cu reacts only with Ge to form the ξ and ε1-Cu3Ge phases. The latter has an orthorhombic structure with average lattice parameters: a = 5.301 Å, bo = 4.204 Å, co = 4.555 Å, arising from the parent hexagonal ξ-phase by Cu-Ge ordering along ao. The interface with GaAs is atomically sharp and free from secondary phases. The ε1-Cu3Ge ordered phase which is chemically inert with respect to GaAs, is believed to be responsible for high thermal stability (up to 450°C), interface sharpness, high contact layer uniformity and low specific resistivity of 6 μΩ cm. Formation of the Cu-Ge phases creates a highly doped n+-GaAs surface layer which leads to the low contact resistivity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Heiblum, M., Nathan, M.I., and Chang, C.A., Solid State Electron. 25, 185 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Murakami, M., Mater. Sci. Rep. 5, 273 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Aboelfotoh, M.O., Lin, C.L., and Woodall, J.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 3245 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Aboelfotoh, M.O., Tawancy, H.M., and Krusin-Elbaum, L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 1622 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Aboelfotoh, M.O., Oktyabrsky, S., Narayan, J., Woodall, J.M., J. AppI. Phys. 75, 5760 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Hansen, M., Constitution of Binary Alloys (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1958), p.585.Google Scholar
7. Oktyabrsky, S., Aboelfotoh, M.O., and Narayan, J., (to be published)Google Scholar
8. Krusin-Elbaum, L. and Aboelfotoh, M.O., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 1341 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Reeves, G.K. and Harrison, H.B., IEEE Electron Device Lett. EDL–3, 111 (1982).Google Scholar
10. Sarma, K., Dalby, R., Rose, K., Aina, O., Katz, W., and Lewis, N., J. Appl. Phys. 56, 2703 (1984).Google Scholar