Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T11:51:27.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structure and Defects of Shock-Processed Ti and Y-Based Copper Oxide Superconductors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

R. Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Center for Solid State Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287.
B. L. Ramakrishna
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Center for Solid State Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287.
Z. Iqbal
Affiliation:
Allied Signal Inc., Research and Technology, Morristown, NJ 07962
N. N. Thadhani
Affiliation:
Center for Explosives Technology Research, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801.
N. Chawla
Affiliation:
Center for Explosives Technology Research, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801.
Get access

Abstract

We have studied the micro-structure of shock synthesized Tl2Ba2CuO6, shockprocessed YBa2Cu3O7 and 10% Ag-YBa2Cu3O7. The structural interpretation of the defects observed in these materials is discussed and compared with computer simulated images. Two planar defects with a stacking sequence of Cu-Ba-Tl-Ba-Cu and Cu-Ba-Tl-Tl-Ba-Cu-Tl-Cu-Ba-Tl-Tl-Ba-Cu in the Tl based oxide and a new defect sequence of Cu-Ba-Cu-Y-Y-Cu-Ba-Cu in the Y based oxides are reported here. An attempt is made to relate the change in superconducting properties observed to the defect structure present.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dover, R.B. van et al; Nature 342, 55 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Cost, J.R. et al; Phys. Rev. 37, 71563 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Umezawa, A. et al; Phys. Rev. 36, 7151 (1987).10.1103/PhysRevB.36.7151Google Scholar
4. Murakami, M. et al; Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 1125 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Jin, S. et al; Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 584(1989).10.1063/1.101464Google Scholar
6. Dutta, B. et al; Solid State Tech. 32, 100 (1989).10.1016/0038-1101(89)90031-2Google Scholar
7. Iqbal, Z. et al; Proc. 2nd Work-shop on Industrial Applications of Feasibility of Dynamic Compaction Technology, Tokyo, (1988) p. 75 Google Scholar
8. Thadhani, N.N., Adv. Mater. Manufacturing Process 3, 493 (1988).10.1080/10426918808953217Google Scholar
9. Stadelmann, P.A.; Ultramicroscopy 21, (1987) 131.Google Scholar
10. Iqbal, Z. et al; Appl. Phys. Lett. 55 (22), 2339 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Hewat, A.W. et al; Physica C 156, 369 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Beyers, R.B. et al; IBM Jour. Res. & Dev. 33, 228 (1989).10.1147/rd.333.0228Google Scholar
13. Hewat, A.W. et al; Physica C 152, 438 (1989).Google Scholar
14. Parise, J.B. and McMarron, E.M. III, J. Sloid State Chem. 83, 188 (1989).Google Scholar
15. Marsh, P.et al; Nature 334, 141 (1988).Google Scholar
16. Calestani, G. and Rizzoli, C., Nature 328, 606 (1987).Google Scholar
17. Gurbauskas, M.F. et al; Inorg. Chem. 26, 3191 (1987)Google Scholar
18. David, W.I.F. et al: Nature 327, 310 (1987).Google Scholar
19. Iqbal, Z. et al; Proc. Intl. Conf. on Superconductivity, Jan. 1990, in press.Google Scholar
20. Michel, C. et al; Synthetic metals 33, 109 (1989).Google Scholar