Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:58:58.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural Evolution During the Sol to Gel Transition of Silicon-Alkoxide Based Sols Observed by Cryogenic Transmission Electron Microscopy (CRYO-TEM)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Joseph K. Bailey
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Martha L. Mecartney
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access

Abstract

The gelation reaction for tetraethoxysilane in both acid and base catalyzed environments was studied using cryogenic transmission electron microscopy. The evolution of the gel structure was observed in wet samples by the technique of fast-freeze vitrification, in which the three dimensional gel structure is preserved in vitreous solvent. The sample is then observed in the electron microscope using a cold stage. Samples were prepared and allowed to react until a specific point of gelation was reached, then were vitrified at that point. Results from this technique show a coarse network structure for base catalyzed gels. This network is composed of silica clusters ≈40Å in size. The acid catalyzed gels show an extremely fine texture (<10Å) at end point of gelation. The structures at intermediate stages of gelation were also determined.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brinker, C. J. and Scherer, G. W., J. Non-Crystalline Solids, 70, 301322 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Sakka, S. and Kamiya, K., J. Non-Crystalline Solids, 48, 3146 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Schaefer, D. W. and Keefer, K. D., in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry, edited by Brinker, C. J., Clark, D. E., and Ulrich, D. R. (Elsevier Science, New York, 1984) 1–14.Google Scholar
4. Keefer, K. D., in Science of Ceramic Chemical Processing, edited by Hench, L. L. and Ulrich, D. R. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986) 131–139.Google Scholar
5. Zarzycki, J., in Science of Ceramic Chemical Processing, edited by Hench, L. L. and Ulrich, D. R. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986) pp. 2136.Google Scholar
6. Himmel, B., Gerber, Th., and Bürger, H., J. Non-Crystalline Solids, 91, 122136 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Brinker, C. J., Keefer, K. D., Schaefer, D. W., and Ashley, C. S., J. Non-Crystalline Solids, 48, 4764 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Mulder, C. A. M., Van Leeuwen-Stienstra, B., van Lierop, J. G., and Woerdman, J. P., J. Non-Crystalline Solids, 82, 148153 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Ruben, G. C. and Shafer, M. W., in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry II. edited by Brinker, C. J., Clark, D. E., and Ulrich, D. R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 22, Pittsburgh, 1986) 207212.Google Scholar
10. Matthews, R. B., Teware, P. H., and Copps, T. P., J. Colloid and Interface Science, 68, 260270 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Bellare, J., Bailey, J. K., and Mecartney, M. L., in Ultrastructure Processing of Advanced Ceramics, edited by Mackenzie, J. D. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, in press).Google Scholar
12. Bailey, J. K., Bellare, J. R., and Mecartney, M. L., in Specimen Preparation for Transmission Electron Microscopy of Materials, edited by Bravman, J. C., Anderson, R. M., and McDonald, M. L. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 115, Pittsburgh, 1988) 6974.Google Scholar