Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T16:16:18.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stereological Estimation of Fractal Number of Fracture Planes in Concrete

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

P. Stroeven*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands, p.stroeven@ct.tudelft.nl.
Get access

Abstract

Concrete is a man-made material containing a particulate filler designed on the basis of a sieve curve. In case of river aggregate, the particles are approximately spherical and smoothtextured. The particle-matrix interface is mostly the weakest chain link in the mechanical system. This implies damage evolution to start at particle-matrix interfaces. In case of direct tension, these interface cracks will be on average perpendicular to the loading direction. In case of direct compression, they will be parallel to the loading direction. A single fracture surface is formed in tension and a series of fracture surfaces in compression. They are the result of crack concentration within a process zone, in which the engineering crack closely meanders around a dividing plane. This allows to model these fracture surfaces on different resolution levels. It is shown, using stereological notions, that the very phenomenon is of a non-ideal fractal nature. Estimates for fractal dimension of fracture surfaces in concretes based on sieve curves at the border of the practical range are found to closely match experimental data reported in the literature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Stroeven, P., Engr. Frac. Mech. 35, 775 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Stroeven, P., Brittle Matrix Composites, edited by Brandt, A.M. and Marshall, A.M. (Elsevier Science Publishers, London, 1991), 1.Google Scholar
3. Stroeven, P., Advanced Studies on Structural Concrete, (LNEC, Lisbon, 1994), p. 125.Google Scholar
4. Stroeven, P., J. Composites, 4, 129 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Underwood, E.E., Acta Stereol., 6(II), 170 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Paumgartner, D., Losa, G. and Weibel, E.R., J Microsc. 121 (Pt1), 5163 (1981).Google Scholar
7. EI-Saouma, V.E., Barton, C.C. and Gamaleldin, N.A., Engr. Frac. Mech. 35, 47 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Rawicki, Z. and Wojnar, L., Acta Stereol., 11 (2), 185 (1992).Google Scholar