Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:46:33.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stability of Non-Hydrogenated and Hydrogenated P-Channel Polycrystalline Silicon Thin-Film Transistors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

N. A. Hastas
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
C. A. Dimitriadis
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
G. Kamarinos
Affiliation:
IMEP ENSERG, 23 rue des Martyrs, BP 257, 38016 Grenoble Cedex 1, France
Get access

Abstract

The effects of high gate voltage Vg stress on the stability of non-hydrogenated and hydrogenated short p-channel polysilicon thin-film transistors (TFTs) are investigated for operation in the saturation region. The degradation mechanisms were identified from the evolution with stress time of the static device parameters. In non-hydrogenated TFTs, transconductance overshoot and a turnover behavior in the threshold voltage were observed. The results indicate that hot-electron trapping near the drain dominates in the initial stages of stress and channel holes are injected into the gate oxide followed by interface states generation as the stress proceeds further. In hydrogenated TFTs, first an effective shortening of the channel length is observed due to trapping of hot-electrons. As the stress proceeds further, donor-type interface states are generated and the electric field near the drain increases due to built-up of positive charge resulted from trapping of hot-holes in these states.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kumar, A., Sin, J. K. O., IEDM Tech. Dig., 515, 1997.Google Scholar
2. Dimitriadis, C. A., Kimura, M., Miyasaka, M., Inoue, S., Farmakis, F. V., Brini, J., and Kamarinos, G., Solid State Electron., 44, 20452051, 2000.Google Scholar
3. Bhattacharya, S., Kovelamudi, R., Batra, S., Banerjee, S., Nguyen, B.Y., and Tobin, R., IEEE Electron Device Lett., 13, 491493, 1992 Google Scholar
4. Angelis, C. T., Dimitriadis, C. A., Miyasaka, M., Farmakis, F. V., Kamarinos, G., Brini, J., Stoemenos, J., J. Appl. Phys, 86, 46004606, 1999.Google Scholar
5. Hastas, N. A., Dimitriadis, C. A., Brini, J., Kamarinos, G., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 49, 15521557, 2002 Google Scholar
6. Miyasaka, M., Stoemenos, J., J. Appl. Phys., 86, 55565565, 1999 Google Scholar
7. Koyanagi, M., Lewis, A. G., Zhu, J., Martin, R. A., Huang, T. Y., Chen, J. Y., IEDM Tech. Dig. 1986, 722.Google Scholar
8. Heremans, P., Bellens, R., Groeseneken, G., Maes, H. E., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 35, 21942209, 1988.Google Scholar