Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-76ns8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T04:33:49.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Source-Term Constraints for the Proposed Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevaida, Derived from the Natural Analog at PeÑa Blanca, Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

William M. Murphy  and
English C. Pearcy
William M. Murphy
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, P.O. Drawer 28510, San Antonio, TX 78228-0510, USA
English C. Pearcy
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, P.O. Drawer 28510, San Antonio, TX 78228-0510, USA
Get access

Abstract

The source term for nuclear waste repository performance assessments can be constrained by the solubilities of radioelement-bearing solids and/or the rates of release of radioelements from nuclear waste forms. Both solubility and rate limits for the proposed repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, can be assessed using information from the natural analog at PeÑa Blanca, Mexico. Petrographic and field relations indicate that uraninite oxidation and transformation to secondary uranyl silicate minerals have been rapid relative to mass transport of uranium out of the PeÑa Blanca system. The rate limiting process for uranium removal is likely to be advective transport in groundwaters with uranium contents controlled by interactions with uranyl silicate minerals such as uranophane. A maximum limit on the rate of uraninite oxidation at PeÑa Blanca is calculated to be 0.032 tons of UO2 per year using geologic constraints on the amount of oxidation and the available time.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 257: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XV , 1991 , 521
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Murphy, W. M., Pearcy, E. C., and Goodell, P. C., in Fourth Natural Analogue Working Group Meeting and Pocos de Caldas Project Final Workshop, edited by Chapman, N. and Côme, B. (Commission of European Communities EUR 13014 EN, Brussels, 1991), pp. 267–276.Google Scholar
2. Pearcy, E. C., Murphy, W. M., and Goodell, P. C., in Energy Resources of the Chihuahua Desert Region, edited by Goodell, P. C., Reyes, I. C., , and Garcia, C. Geol, G. El Paso. Soc. Special Pub., El Paso, in press).Google Scholar
3. Ildefonse, P., Muller, J.-P., Clozel, B., and Calas, G., Engin. Geol. 29, 413 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Goodell, P. C., in Uranium in Volcanic and Volcanoclastic Rocks, edited by Goodell, P. C. and Waters, A. C. (Amer. Asso. Petrol. Geol. Studies in Geology, 13, Tulsa, 1981), pp. 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Johnson, L. H. and Shoesmith, D. W., in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R. C. (North Holland Publishers, New York, 1988), pp. 635–698.Google Scholar
6. Bruton, C. J. and Shaw, H. F., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, edited by Apted, M. J. and Westerman, R. E. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1987), pp. 485–494.Google Scholar
7. Wilson, C. N., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV, edited by Abrajano, T. Jr., and Johnson, L. H. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1991), pp. 197–204.Google Scholar
8. Hemingway, B. S., U.S. Geological Survey Open File Rept. 82-619 (1982), p. 90.Google Scholar
9. Langmuir, D., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 42, 547 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Nguyen, S. N., Silva, R. J., Weed, H. C., and Andrews, J. E. Jr., Lawrence Livermore National Lab., UCRL-JC-106032 (1991), p. 32.Google Scholar
11. George-Aniel, B., Leroy, L. L., and Poty, B., Econ. Geol. 86, 233 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Broxton, D. E., Bish, D. L., and Warren, R. G., Clays Clay Miner. 3U, 89 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. White, A. F., Claassen, H. C., and Benson, L. V., U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Pap. 1535–Q (1980), p. 34.Google Scholar
14. Pearcy, E. C. and Murphy, W. M., Geol. Soc. Amer. Abst. Prog. 23, A419 (1991).Google Scholar
15. Wernicke, B., private communication.Google Scholar
16. Wolery, T. J., Lawrence Livermore National Lab., UCRL-53414 (1983), p. 191.Google Scholar
17. Grambow, B., Werme, L. O., Forsyth, R. S., and Bruno, J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Mananement XIII, edited by Oversby, V. M. and Brown, P. W. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1990), pp. 465–474.Google Scholar