Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T03:11:16.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sorption Kinetics of Uranium-238, Neptunium-237, Caesium-134, and Strontium-85 on a Glacial Deposit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

L.N. Moyes
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, U.K., lesley.moyes@stud.man.ac.uk
D.J. Bunker
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, U.K.
J.T. Smith
Affiliation:
Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, U.K.
F.R. Livens
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, U.K.
C.R. Hughes
Affiliation:
Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, U.K.
J. Hilton
Affiliation:
Institute of Freshwater Ecology, East Stoke, Wareham, BH20 6BB, U.K.
A. Braithwaite
Affiliation:
Institute of Freshwater Ecology, East Stoke, Wareham, BH20 6BB, U.K.
S. Richardson
Affiliation:
BNFL, Sellafield R&D, Seascale, Cumbria, CA20 1PG, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

Batch sorption experiments have been used to assess the sorption behaviour of four radionuclides, important in the context of low-level waste disposal, on a glacial substrate. Data for sorption of 238U, 237Np, 134Cs and 85Sr are compared and agree well with independent studies. A series of well-established kinetic models have been used to describe the individual uptake mechanisms and rate parameters reported. Sorption occurs via both equilibrium and kinetically controlled pathways, with neptunium sorption being under kinetic control to the greatest extent.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Dozol, M. and Hagenmann, R., Pure & Appl. Chem. 65, p. 1081 (1993).Google Scholar
2 Hsu, C. and Chang, K., Radiochimica Acta. 68, p. 129 (1995).Google Scholar
3 Sposito, G., The Surface Chemistry of Soils. Oxford Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984 pp15.Google Scholar
4 Milodowski, A., Technical Report WE/90/24 British Geological Survey, Keyworth, (1991).Google Scholar
5 Loftus, C., Mineralogical Characterisation of Selected Glacial Drift Deposits. MSc Dissertation, (1995), University of Manchester.Google Scholar
6 Hird, A.B., Rimmer, D.L. and Livens, F.R., J. Environ. Radioactivity. 26, p. 103 (1995).Google Scholar
7 Comans, R.N.J. and Hockley, D.E., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta. 56, p. 1157 (1992).Google Scholar
8 Torstenfelt, B., Andersson, K., and Allard, B., Chem. Geol. 36, p. 123 (1982).Google Scholar
9 Nyfeller, U.P., Li, Y., and Santschi, P.H., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta. 48, p. 1513 (1984).Google Scholar
10 Jannasch, H.W., Honeyman, B.D., Balistrieri, L.S. and Murray, J.W., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta. 52, p.567 (1988).Google Scholar
11 Bunker, D.J., Sorption Kinetics of Co, Sr, Ru and Cs in Freshwater Systems. PhD Thesis (1997) University of Manchester.Google Scholar
12 Comans, R.N.J., Haller, M. and Preter, P. De, Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta. 55, p.433 (1991).Google Scholar
13 Cremers, A., Elsen, A., Preter, P. De and Maes, A., Nature. 335, p. 247 (1988).Google Scholar
14 Payne, T.E. and Waite, T.D., Radiochimica Acta. 52/53, p.487 (1991).Google Scholar
15 Waite, T.D., Davis, J.A., Payne, T.E., Waychunas, G.A. and Xu, N., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta. 58, p.5465 (1994).Google Scholar
16 Chisholm-Brause, C., Conradson, S.D., Buscher, C.T., Eller, P.G. and Morris, D.E., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta. 58, p.3625 (1994).Google Scholar
17 Combes, J-M., Chisholm-Brause, C.J., Brown, G.E. Jr. and Parks, G.A., Env. Sci. Tech. 26, p.376 (1992).Google Scholar
18 Tochiyama, O., Endo, S. and Inoue, Y., Radiochimica Acta. 68, p. 105 (1995).Google Scholar