Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T11:56:17.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Solvent Effects on C60 Excited State Cross Sections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Daniel G. McLean
Affiliation:
Science Applications International Corporation, Dayton, OH;
Donna M. Brandelik
Affiliation:
Science Applications International Corporation, Dayton, OH;
Mark C. Brant
Affiliation:
Science Applications International Corporation, Dayton, OH;
Richard L. Sutherland
Affiliation:
Science Applications International Corporation, Dayton, OH;
Lynn Frock
Affiliation:
Wright Laboratory WL/MLPJ, WPAFB, OH
Get access

Abstract

A survey study of solvent effects on the linear and nonlinear absorption properties of C60 has been done. The nonlinear absorption measurements are done at 694 nm with a Q-switched Nd:YAG pumped dye laser. In conjunction with this study a three level rate equation system has been solved analytically and the model results used to extract effective excited state cross sections. A difference and a ratio are calculated from the effective excited state cross section and the ground state cross section. The analysis demonstrates that it is this difference and the initial transmission which determine the critical fluence for the onset of nonlinear absorption. The saturation behavior is determined by the ratio of the cross sections and the initial transmission. Based on these findings C60 is shown to have some of the highest reported nonlinear absorption properties at 694 nm. The effective excited state cross sections at 694 nm are reported for the solutions and correlations to the solvent types demonstrated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Heflin, J.R., Wang, S., Marciu, D., Freeland, J. W., and Jenkins, B., Polymer Preprints 35, 238 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Wray, J.E., Liu, K. C., Chen, C.H., Garret, W.R., Payne, M.G., Goedert, R., Templeton, D., Appl. Phys. Lett., 64, 2785 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Tutt, L.W. and Boggess, T.F., Progress in Quantum Electronics, 17, 299 (1993).Google Scholar
4. McLean, D.G., Sutherland, R.L., Brant, M.C., Brandelik, D.M., Fleitz, P.A., and Pottenger, T., Opt. Lett. 18, 858 (1993).Google Scholar
5. McLean, D.G., Sutherland, R.L., Brant, M.C., Brandelik, D.M., and Fleitz, P.A., Nonlinear Optical Materials for Swithching and Limiting, edited by. M.J. Soileau, (SPIE Proceedings, 2229, Orlando, Florida, 7 April, 1994) pp. 68–77.Google Scholar
6. Ebbeson, T. W., Tanigaki, K., and Kuroshima, S., Chem. Phys. Lett., 181 501, (1991).Google Scholar
7. Kim, D., Lee, M., Suh, Y. D., Kim, S. K., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114 4429 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Brandelik, D. M., McLean, D. G., Brant, M. C., Sutherland, R. L., Frock, L., and Crane, R.L., Complex Formations in C60 Solutions, presented at the Fall Meeting of the Materials Research Society: Boston, Massachusetts 27 November 1994,Google Scholar
9. Hood, P.J., Edmonds, B.P., McLean, D. G. and Brandelik, D. M., Nonlinear Optical Materials for Swithching and Limiting, edited by. M.J. Soileau, (SPIE Proceedings, 2229, Orlando, Florida, 7 April, 1994) pp. 91–99Google Scholar