Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:28:38.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solution of the Atomic Structure of the Σ=5 (310) [001] Grain Boundary in Nial by Hrem and Atomistic Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

R. W. Fonda ,
M. Yan  and
D. E. Luzzi
R. W. Fonda
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC.
M. Yan
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM
D. E. Luzzi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Get access

Abstract

The atomic structure of the Σ = 5 (310) [001] grain boundary in NiAl has been determined by a synergistic approach combining high resolution electron microscopy (HREM) and atomistic structure calculations. A bicrystal of controlled orientation was produced by diffusion bonding and imaged with the electron beam parallel to the [001] tilt axis. The results showed that the material remains chemically ordered up to the boundary plane. Atomistic structure calculations employed N-body empirical potentials developed for the NiAl phase to examine the changes in interfacial energy due to the incorporation of various point defects at the grain boundary. A self-consistent model structure was determined which was of lowest energy and produced calculated images which matched experimental images of the boundary. Monte Carlo simulations confirm the stability of this structure at finite temperatures.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 364: Symposium L – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys–VI , 1994 , 461
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Vitek, V., Chen, S. P., Voter, A. F., Kruisman, J. J., and De Hosson, J. Th. M., in Grain Boundary Chemistry and Intergranular Fracture, edited by G. S. Was and S. M. Bruemmer, Mat. Sci. Forum, 46, 237 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Vitek, V. and Chen, S. P., Scripta Metall., 25, 1237 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Darolia, R., J. Metals, 43, 44 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Hahn, K. H. and Vedula, K., Scripta Metall., 23, 7 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Bradley, A. J. and Taylor, A., Proc. Roy. Soc, A159, 56 (1937).Google Scholar
6. Camus, P. P., Baker, I., Horton, J. A., and Miller, M. K., 1988, J. Physique, 40, C6–329 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Chen, S. P., Voter, A. F., Boring, A. M., Albers, R. C., and Hay, P. J. in High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys III, edited by Liu, C. T., Taub, A. I., Stoloff, N. S., and Koch, C. C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 133, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989) p. 149.Google Scholar
8. Petton, G. and Farkas, D., Scripta Metall., 25, 55 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Voter, A. F. and Chen, S. P. in Characterization of Defects in Materials, edited by Siegel, R. W., Weertman, J. R., and Sinclair, R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 82, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987) p. 175.Google Scholar
10. Fonda, R. W. and Luzzi, D. E., Phil. Mag. A, 68, 1151 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Finnis, M. W. and Sinclair, J. E., Philos. Mag. A, 50, 45 (1984).Google Scholar
12. Ackland, G. J., Tichy, G., Vitek, V., and Finnis, M. W., Philos. Mag. A, 56, 735 (1987).Google Scholar
13. Vitek, V., Ackland, G. J., and Cserti, J.,.in Alloy Phase Stability and Design, edited by Stocks, G. M., Pope, D. P., and Giamei, A. F. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 186, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991) p. 237.Google Scholar
14. Wasilewski, R. J., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 29, 39 (1968).Google Scholar