Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T22:39:18.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shallow Doping of Gallium Arsenide by Recoil Implantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

D. K. Sadana
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.
J. P. de Souza
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.
R. F. Rutz
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.
F. Cardone
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.
M. H. Norcott
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.
Get access

Abstract

Si atoms were recoil-implanted into GaAs by bombarding neutral (As+) or dopant (Si+) ions through a thin Si cap. The bombarded samples were subsequently rapid thermally or furnace annealed at 815–1000°C in Ar or arsine ambient. The presence of the recoiled Si in GaAs and resulting ni-doping was confirmed by secondary ion mass spectrometry and Hall measurements. It was found that sheet resistances of < 150 Ω/‪ can be achieved by this method. Capless furnace annealing in arsine ambient generally yielded better electrical results (especially for shallow implants, i.e., < 100 nm deep) compared to those obtained by RTA in an inert ambient with a Si cap. In the latter case, electrical activation deteriorated above 900°C due to high As loss and the deterioration was pronounced for shallow implants. Significant Si redistribution occurred during arsine annealing whenever the Si concentration (from recoil or direct implant) in GaAs exceeded 1×1019cm3 and the annealing temperature was > 850°C. Our present electrical data show that the recoil implant method is a viable alternative to direct shallow implant for n+ doping of GaAs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Grob, A., Grob, J.J., Mesli, I., Sales, D. and Siffert, P., Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 182/183, 93 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Bruel, M., Flocari, M. and Gailliard, J.D., Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 182/183, 93 (1981).Google Scholar
3. Erichsen, R. Jr., Baumvol, I.J.R. and de Souza, J.P., Nucl. Instrum, Methods, B7/8, 316 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Yamamoto, Y., Fujima, S., Takada, H., Segawa, Y. and Ishibashi, K., Nucl. Instrum. Methods, B19/20, 392 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Eizenberg, M., Callegari, A.C., Sadana, D.K., Hovel, H.J. and Jackson, T.N., Appl. Phys. Lett., 54, 1696 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Ziegler, J.F., Biersack, J.P. and Littmark, U., “The Stopping and Range of Ion in Solids”, Pergamon Press, 1985.Google Scholar
7. Christel, L.A., Gibbons, J.F. and Mylroie, S., Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 182/183, 187 (1981).Google Scholar