Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T23:26:14.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Secondary Electron Emission Spectroscopy of Crystalline and Non-Crystalline Carbon Allotropes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Alon Hoffman
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physies and Microelectronics and Materials Technology Centre, Victoria University of Technology, (RMIT), G.P.O. Box 2476V, Melbourne, Victoria, 3001, Australia.
Steven Prawer
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physies and Microelectronics and Materials Technology Centre, Victoria University of Technology, (RMIT), G.P.O. Box 2476V, Melbourne, Victoria, 3001, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

The Secondary Electron Emission (SEE) spectra of type Ha diamond, highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG), amorphous carbon (e-beam evaporated), glassy carbon and amorphic-diamond (filtered arc evaporated) were measured in the 0–80 eV electron kinetic energy range, and found to be very distinctive for the different carbon allotropcs. The sensitivity of SEE spectroscopy to crystal damage for the type Ha diamond surface was studied by performing SEE measurements as function of 1 keV argon ion irradiation dose. Two examples of the use of SEE in the characterization of diamond surfaces are presented. In the first, the crystalline quality of the back and front surfaces of a chemically vapour deposited diamond thin film which had dclaminated from a fused quartz substrate were compared using SEE and, in the second, SEE was used to provide a qualitative estimate of the damage induced by mechanical polishing of a natural diamond surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Willis, R.F., Fitton, B., Painter, G.S., Phys. Rev. B9, 1926, (1974).Google Scholar
2. Hoffman, A., Folman, M., and Prawer, S., Phys. Rev. B submitted.Google Scholar
3. Hoffman, A., Nyberg, G.L., Prawer, S., Journal of Physics, Condensed Matter, 2, 80998106, (1990).Google Scholar
4. Caputi, L.S., Chiarello, G., Colavita, E., Santoniello, A., Papagno, L., Surf. Sci. 152/153, 278 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Law, A.R., Barry, J.S., Hughes, H.P., Phys. Rev. B28, 5332 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Himpsel, F.J., van der Veen, J.F., Eastman, D.E., Phys. Rev. B22, 1967, (1980).Google Scholar
7. Morar, J.F., Himpsel, F.J., Hollinger, G., Hughes, G., Jordan, J.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1960 (1985).Google Scholar
8. Painter, G.S., Ellis, D.E., Lubinsky, A.R., Phys. Rev. B4, 3610 (1971).Google Scholar
9. Hoffman, A., Paterson, P.J.K., Prawer, S., Nuclear Inst. Meth. Phys. Research B51, (1990), 226.Google Scholar
10. Martin, P.J., Filipczuk, S.W., Nelterfield, R.P., Field, J.S., Whitnall, D.F., McKenzie, D.R., Journal of Materials Science Letters 7, (1988) 410.Google Scholar
11. McKenzie, D.R., Martin, P.J., White, S.B., Liu, Z., Sainly, W.G., Cockayne, D.J.H., Dwarte, D.M., E-MRS meeting June 1987, Vol. XVIII, 203.Google Scholar
12. Lurie, P.G., Wilson, J.M., Surf. Sci. 65 (1977) 45.Google Scholar
13. Prawer, S., Roussouw, C.J., J. Appl. Physics 63, (1988) 4435.Google Scholar
14. Vavilov, V.S., Krasnopertrcv, V.V., Milzutin, Yu. V., Gorodetsky, A.E., Zakharov, A.P., Radial. Eff. 22(1974) 141.Google Scholar
15. Hoffman, A., Prawer, S., to be submitted to Nuclear Inst. Meth. Phys. Research B.Google Scholar
16. O’Reilly, E.P., Robertson, J., Beeman, D., Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 77/78, 83, (1985).Google Scholar
17. Tsai, Hsiao-chu, Bogy, D.B.. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A5, 3287, (1987).Google Scholar