Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:26:40.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of Voltage Scan Rate on Degradation of Graphite Electrodes Electrochemically Cycled vs. Li/Li+

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2012

Sandeep Bhattacharya
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Automotive and Materials Engineering, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, Canada N9B 3P4.
A. Reza Riahi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Automotive and Materials Engineering, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, Canada N9B 3P4.
Ahmet T. Alpas
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Automotive and Materials Engineering, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, Canada N9B 3P4.
Get access

Abstract

Graphite electrode surface degradation mechanisms and formation of solid electrolyte layers (SEI) at the interface with the electrolyte were studied as a function of the applied voltage and voltage scan rates using in situ optical microscopy. Voltammetry tests were initiated from a peak voltage of 3.00 V during which the voltage was decreased to a constant base potential (0.02 V) using different scan rates of 0.05-5.00 mV/s. Cross-sectional FIB microscopy indicated that graphite surface and subsurface damage -- in the form of loss of material from graphite -- was reduced when dense and continuous deposits of SEI formed at low scan rates (e.g. 0.05 mV/s).Whereas, non-uniform and discontinuous SEI formed at high scan rates (∼ 5.00 mV/s) was unable to alleviate graphite surface damage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Novák, P., Goers, D., and Spahr, M.E., in Carbon Materials for Electrochemical Energy Storage Systems, edited by Béguin, F., and Frackowiak, E. (CRC Press - Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, New York, 2010).Google Scholar
2. Winter, M., Besenhard, J.O., Spahr, M.E. and Novák, P., Adv. Mater. 10, 725 (1998).Google Scholar
3. Peled, E., J.Electrochem. Soc. 126, 2047 (1979).Google Scholar
4. Besenhard, J.O., Winter, M., Yang, J. and Biberacher, W., J. Power Sources 54, 228 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Goers, D., Holzapfel, M., Scheifele, W., Lehmann, E., Vontobel, P. and Novák, P., J. Power Sources 130, 221 (2004).Google Scholar
6. Winter, M., Wrodnigg, G.H., Besenhard, J.O., Biberacher, W. and Novák, P., J. Electrochem. Soc. 147, 2427 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Aurbach, D., Koltypin, M., Teller, H., Langmuir 18, 9000 (2002).Google Scholar
8. Abe, T., Kawabata, N., Mizutani, Y., Inaba, M., Ogumi, Z., J.Electrochem. Soc. 150, A257 (2003).Google Scholar
9. Hardwick, L. J., Buqa, H., Holzapfel, M., Scheifele, W., Krumeich, F. and Novak, P., Electrochim. Acta 52, 4884 (2007).Google Scholar
10. Bhattacharya, S., Riahi, A. R. and Alpas, A. T., J. Power Sources, 196, 8719 (2011).Google Scholar
11. Verma, P., Maire, P. and Novák, P., Electrochim. Acta 55, 6332 (2010).Google Scholar
12. Bhattacharya, S., Riahi, A. R. and Alpas, A. T., in Microstructure, Mechanisms, and Modeling of Battery Materials: Electrochemical Society (ECS) Transactions, edited by Harris, S. J., Qi, Y., Lu, P., and Jiang, M. (219th ECS Meeting, 35, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2011) pp. 2738.Google Scholar
13. Bhattacharya, S., Riahi, A. R. and Alpas, A. T., Scripta Mater., 64, 165 (2011).Google Scholar
14. Bhattacharya, S., Riahi, A. R., and Alpas, A. T. in Advances and Applications in Electroceramics: Ceramic Transactions, edited by Nair, K. M., Priya, S., and Jia, Q. (Mater. Sci. & Tech. Conference & Exhibition, 227, Houston, TX, 2011) pp. 1726.Google Scholar