Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:13:17.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of Impurities in Hydride Vapor Phase Epitaxially Grown Gallium Nitride

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

R. J. Molnar
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA 02173-9108
K. B. Nichols
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA 02173-9108
P. Maki
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA 02173-9108
E. R. Brown
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA 02173-9108
I. Melngailis
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington, MA 02173-9108
Get access

Abstract

Gallium nitride (GaN) films grown by hydride vapor phase epitaxy on a variety of substrates have been investigated to study what role silicon and oxygen impurities play in determining the residual donor levels found in these films. Secondary ion mass spectroscopy analysis has been performed on these films and impurity levels have been normalized to ion implanted calibration standards. While oxygen appears to be a predominate impurity in all of the films, in many of them the sum of silicon and oxygen levels is insufficient to account for the donor concentration determined by Hall measurements. This suggests that either another impurity or a native defect is at least partly responsible for the autodoping of GaN. Additionally, the variation of impurity and carrier concentration with surface orientation and/or nucleation density suggests either a crystallographic or defect-related incorporation mechanism.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Detchprohm, T., Hiramatsu, K., Amano, H. and Akasaki, I., Appl. Phys Lett. 61, 2688 (1992).Google Scholar
2 Maruska, H.P. and Tietjen, J.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 15, 327 (1969).Google Scholar
3 Seifert, W., Franzheld, R., Butter, E., Sobotta, H. and Riede, V., Cryst. Res. Technol. 18, 383 (1983).Google Scholar
4 Neugebauer, J. and Van de Walle, C.G., Phys. Rev. B 50, 8067 (1994).Google Scholar
5 Baranov, B., Däweritz, L., Gutan, V.B., Jungk, G., Neumann, H. and Raidt, H., Phys. Status Solid. A 49, 629 (1978).Google Scholar
6 Ilegems, M. and Montgomery, H.C., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 34, 885 (1973).Google Scholar
7 Chung, B.C. and Gershenzon, M., J. Appl. Phys. 72, 651 (1992).Google Scholar
8 Sasaki, T., J. Cryst. Growth 129, 81 (1993).Google Scholar
9 Naniwae, K., Itoh, S., Amano, H., Itoh, K., Hiramatsu, K. and Akasaki, I., J. Cryst. Growth 99, 381 (1990).Google Scholar
10 Hwang, J.S., Kuznetsov, A.V., Lee, S.S., Kim, H.S., Choi, J.G. and Chong, P.J., J. Cryst. Growth 142, 5 (1994).Google Scholar
11 Work was performed at Charles Evans and Associates, West, Job # 47916.Google Scholar
12 Molnar, R. J., Singh, R. and Moustakas, T.D., J. Electron. Mater. 24, 275 (1995).Google Scholar
13 Molnar, R.J. and Moustakas, T.D., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 4587 (1994).Google Scholar