Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:35:39.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of Charged Gap States in Light-Induced Degradation of Single-Junction a-Si:H Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

M. Zeman
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology – DIMES, P.O. Box 5053, 2600 GB Delft, The Netherlands
V. Nádazdy
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology – DIMES, P.O. Box 5053, 2600 GB Delft, The Netherlands
J.W. Metselaar
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology – DIMES, P.O. Box 5053, 2600 GB Delft, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Computer simulations of single-junction hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) solar cells with different thickness of the intrinsic layer were carried out in order to study the role of charge gap states in their light-induced degradation. It is demonstrated that it is the decrease of positively charged states above midgap, Dh, and the increase of neutral states around midgap,Dz, and negatively charged states below midgap, De in the intrinsic layer that result in a drop of performance of the solar cells due to light soaking. These changes in the gap states are in accordance with our recent experimental results from the charge deep-level transient spectroscopy on undoped a-Si:H. The experimentally observed changes in the dark and illuminated J-V curves and spectral response could not be simulated with the same set of input parameters by only increasing the defect-state density in the intrinsic layer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Staebler, D.L. and Wronski, C.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 292 (1977).Google Scholar
2. Fritzsche, H., Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 31, 47 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Zeman, M., Nádazdy, V., Swaaij, R. van, Durný, R., Metselaar, J.W., in Amorphous and Nanocrystalline Silicon-Based Films – 2003, edited by Abelson, J.R., Ganguly, G., Matsumura, H., Robertson, J., Schiff, E., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc., 762, San Francisco, CA, 2003). pp. 3944.Google Scholar
4. Nádazdy, V. and Zeman, M., Phys. Rev. B69 (16), (2004).Google Scholar
5. Powell, M.J. and Deane, S.C., Phys. Rev. B48, 10 815 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Powell, M.J. and Deane, S.C., Phys. Rev. B53, 10 121 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Zeman, M., Swaaij, R.A.C.M.M. van, Heuvel, J.G. van, and Metselaar, J.W., in Amorphous and Heterogenous Silicon-Based Films - 2001 edited by Stutzmann, M., Boyce, J.B., Cohen, J.D., Collins, R.W., Hanna, J., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 664, Warrendale, 2001) p. A25.1.Google Scholar
8. Schropp, R.E.I. and Zeman, M., in Amorphous and Microcrystalline Solar Cells: Modeling, Materials, and Device Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998, p.184.Google Scholar
9. Zeman, M., Nádazdy, V., Swaaij, R. van, Metselaar, J.W., Proceedings CD of the 3rd World Conference on Photovoltaic Conversion, Osaka, Japan, May 11-18, 2003, (5PA905).Google Scholar
10. Jiao, L., Liu, H., Semoushikina, S., Lee, Y., and Wronski, C.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69 (24), 3713 (1996).Google Scholar