Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T02:08:39.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of Charged Defects In Current Transport Through Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S.P. Lau
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, Information Technology and Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 5XH, United Kingdom
J.M. Shannon
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, Information Technology and Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 5XH, United Kingdom
B.J. Sealy
Affiliation:
School of Electronic Engineering, Information Technology and Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 5XH, United Kingdom
J.M. Marshall
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

Current transport in metal-semiconductor-metal structures based on amorphous silicon alloys has been studied in relation to the density of dangling bond state defects. The density of defects was changed by varying alloy composition or by current stressing. We show that the change of current-voltage characteristics and activation energy with defect density and the onset of Poole-Frenkel conduction with composition require charged defects. It is found that there are more charged defects in amorphous silicon nitride (a-Si1−xNx:H) than in amorphous silicon carbide (a-Si1−xCx:H). In addition, an excess of negatively charged dangling bond defects compared to positively charged dangling bond defects is observed in a-Si1−xNx:H films. This is attributed to the presence of N4+ act as the donor states in silicon nitride. We find that the density of charged dangling bond defects can be higher than 1019cm−3.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Alder, D., Solar Cells 9, 113 (1983).Google Scholar
2 Staebler, D.L. and Wronski, C.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 292 (1977).Google Scholar
3 Shimizu, T., Kidoh, H., Morimoto, A. and Kumeda, M., Jap. J. of Appl. Phys. 28, 586 (1989).Google Scholar
4 Deane, S.C. and Powell, M.J., Phys. Rev. B 48, 10815 (1993).Google Scholar
5 Powell, M.J. and Deane, S.C., Phys. Rev. B 53, 10121 (1996).Google Scholar
6 Schumm, G., Lotter, E. and Bauer, G.H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 3262 (1992).Google Scholar
7 Jiao, J., Liu, H., Semoushikina, S., Lee, Y. and Wronski, C.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 3713 (1996).Google Scholar
8 Shimizu, T., Ishii, T., Kumeda, M., Masuda, A., J. of Non-Cryst. Solids, in press (1998).Google Scholar
9 Shannon, J.M. and Annis, A.D., Phil. Mag. Lett. 72, 323 (1995).Google Scholar
10 Shannon, J.M., Lau, S.P., Annis, A.D. and Sealy, B.J., Solid State Electronics 42, 91 (1998).Google Scholar
11 Shannon, J.M., Deane, S.C., McGarvey, B. and Sandoe, J.N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 2978 (1994).Google Scholar
12 Masuda, A., Itoh, K., Kumeda, M. and Shimizu, T., J. of Non-Cryst. Solids 198–200, 395 (1996).Google Scholar
13 Fritzsche, H. and Nakayama, Y., Philos. Mag. B69, 359 (1994).Google Scholar
14 McGarvey, B., Clegg, J.B., Deane, S.C., Sandoe, J.N. and Shannon, J.M., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 467, 955 (1997).Google Scholar
15 Frenkel, J., Phys. Rev. 54, 647 (1938).Google Scholar
16 Hill, R.M., Thin Solid Films 8, R21 (1971).Google Scholar
17 Lau, S.P., Shannon, J.M. and Sealy, B.J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, in press (1998).Google Scholar