Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:38:27.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Restricted Hydration of Mass-Cured Concrete Containing Fly Ash

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

R. H. Mills
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, 35 St. George St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S IA4
N. Buenfeld
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Imperial College, Imperial College Road, London, SW7 2BU, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

Cement paste and concrete specimens containing three different mixtures of portland cement (PC) and high-lime fly ash (FA) were subjected to various curing conditions, and the strengths, non-evaporable water, and porosities compared with control mixes containing portland cement only. Strength and porosity data indicated that the cementing action of the mixtures was in all cases inferior to portland cement. For each mixture the strength loss resulting from imperfect curing, i.e. sealed or exposed to 50% relative humidity, was greater than for portland cement. In the case of concrete drying from one surface, strength differences were found, but these were not as clearly defined as those obtained in the paste specimens.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. ACI Committee 308–81, Standard Practice for Curing Concrete (ACI, Detroit, 1986).Google Scholar
2. Mills, R.H., in Blended Cements, STP 897, edited by Frohnsdorff, G., (ASTM, Philadelphia, 1986) pp. 4961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Shalon, R. and Ravina, D., in International Symposium on Concrete and Reinforced Concrete in Hot Countries, Haifa (RILEM, 1960).Google Scholar
4. Mills, R.H., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-Products: Characterization. Utilization and Disposal II, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P. and Roy, D. (MRS 65, Pittsburgh, 1986) pp. 207217.Google Scholar