Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T15:12:48.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resistivity Control by Solid-State Reaction of Perovskite-Type Oxides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

H. Nagamoto
Affiliation:
Kogakuin University, 1–24–2 Nishi–Shinjuku, Shinjuku–ku, Tokyo 163–91, Japan
H. Tanaka
Affiliation:
Kogakuin University, 1–24–2 Nishi–Shinjuku, Shinjuku–ku, Tokyo 163–91, Japan
T. Koya
Affiliation:
Fbara Corporation, 4–2–1 Hon–Fujisawa, Fujisawa 251, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Resistivity control has been conducted by solid–state reaction of two different perovskite–type oxides. One is La0.5Ba0.5CoO3−δ (LBC) which showed metallic conduction, and its resistivity, ρ was 10−3 Ω.cm at 20 °C. The other is Ba0.998Sb0.002TiO3 (BT) which showed positive temperature coefficient of resistivity (PTCR) effect. The sintered body of the mixiure of the two oxides did not show PTCR effect. The logarithm of the resistivity of the sintered body, log ρmix was expressed using the resistivity of LBC, ρLBC, the molar ratio of BT, x, and temperature dependent constant, α(T) as

log ρmix = (l–x) log PLBC + (T)

which holds for 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.8 at the temperature ranging from 20 to 240° C ρmix changed by about 8 orders of magnitude at room temperature. X–ray diffraction analysis suggested that metal ions at the A–site move from one perovskite–type oxide to another and that the sintered body consisted of two perovskite–type oxides different from starting ones.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Grekila, R. B. and Tien, T. Y., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 48, 2225 (1965).Google Scholar
2. Gurland, J., Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME, 236, 642646 (1966).Google Scholar
3. Malliaris, A. and Turner, D. T., J. Appl. Phys., 42, 614618 (1971).Google Scholar
4. Aharoni, S. M., ibid., 43, 24632465 (1972).Google Scholar
5. Pike, G. E., AIP Conf. Proc., 40, 366371 (1978).Google Scholar
6. Stauffer, D., Phys. Rep., 54,174 (1979).Google Scholar
7. Ewen, P. J. S. and Robertson, J. M., J. Phys. D, 14, 22532268 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Nagamoto, H. and Inoue, H., J. Electrochem. Soc., 136, 2088 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Shannon, R. D., Acta Cryst., A32, 751767 (1976).Google Scholar
10. Hasegawa, A., Doctoral Thesis, The University of Tokyo (1991).Google Scholar