Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T22:46:37.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Replications of Critical Technological Processes and the Use of Replicates as Characterization Standards: An Experiment in Undergraduate Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Pamela B. Vandiver ,
Heather Raftery ,
Stephanie Ratcliffe ,
Brian T. Moskalik ,
Michelle Andaloro ,
Katelyn Sandler  and
Alicia Retamoza
Pamela B. Vandiver
Affiliation:
vandiver@mse.arizona.edu, University of Arizona, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering,, Program in Heritage Conservation Science, and Department of Anthropology, Tucson, AZ, 85721, United States, 520-400-2270, 520-621-8059
Heather Raftery
Affiliation:
raftery@email.arizona.edu, University of Arizona, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Program in Heritage Conservation Science, Tucson, AZ, 85721, United States
Stephanie Ratcliffe
Affiliation:
ratcliffe@gmail.com, University of Arizona, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Program in Heritage Conservation Science, Tucson, AZ, 85721, United States
Brian T. Moskalik
Affiliation:
moskalik@email.arizona.edu, University of Arizona, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Program in Heritage Conservation Science, Tucson, AZ, 85721, United States
Michelle Andaloro
Affiliation:
michella@email.arizona.edu, University of Arizona, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Program in Heritage Conservation Science, Tucson, AZ, 85721, United States
Katelyn Sandler
Affiliation:
ksad@email.arizona.edu, University of Arizona, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Program in Heritage Conservation Science, Tucson, AZ, 85721, United States
Alicia Retamoza
Affiliation:
retamoza@email.arizona.edu, University of Arizona, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Program in Heritage Conservation Science, Tucson, AZ, 85721, United States
Get access

Abstract

The technology of artifacts is analyzed and reconstructed by comparison with known craft practices, the physical and chemical constraints imposed by the raw materials, and the sequence and steps for processing those materials to achieve certain optical and mechanical properties. Understanding of craft knowledge is best pursued by practice, coupled with technical analysis. Six case studies of hands-on, undergraduate student laboratory projects are presented. The studies include testing parameters for the making of stenciled hand images similar to those at caves such as Gargas from the Upper Paleolithic period in France, the variation in processing required to produce Egyptian blue pigments and objects, controlling composition to form either green or turquoise-blue colors in Islamic lead-containing glazes, optimizing the ratio of various pigments to gum Arabic medium in tomb paintings to evaluate the application and durability, molding East Asian gokok beads in imitation of jade, and making and radiographing a mock-up of a damaged statue on the facade at the San Xavier Mission as a standard for comparison with the original. In each case, various parameters are varied to model the appearance, structure and composition of an object, and the students benefited from the experience of developing research questions and from their involvement in original research projects.

Keywords

archaeologyceramicsintering
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1047: Symposium Y – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology VIII , 2007 , 1047-Y02-04
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Vandiver, P.B., “Reconstructing and Interpreting the Technologies of Ancient Ceramics,” in Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology, vol. 1, eds. Sayre, E.V., Vandiver, P.B., Druzik, J. and Stevenson, C., MRS Symp. Proc. vol. 123, 1988, 89–102.Google Scholar
2. Leroi-Gourham, A. et al. , L'Art des Cavernes: Atlas des Grottes Ornees Paleolithiques Francaises, Ministere de la Culture, Paris, 1984, pp. 467ff, 514ff, and Clottes, J. and Courtin, J., Cosquer, La Grotte, Editions du Seuil, Paris, 1994.Google Scholar
3. Lorblanchet, M., personal communication, 1988, and demonstrated in National Geographic Society video on Paleolithic Cave Art, 1994.Google Scholar
4. Raftery, H, “Paleolithic Hand Stencil Technology,” Department of Anthropology 399, and Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering 258 course records, fall 2006 and spring 2005, respectively, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, unpublished ms.Google Scholar
5. Delamare, F., “Le Bleu Egyptien, Essai de Bibliographie Critique,” in La Couleur dans la Peinture et L'Emaillage de L'Egypt Ancienne, eds. Colinart, S. and Menu, M., Centro Universitario Europeo per i Beni Culturali, Ravello, Italy, Edipuglia, 1998, 143–162.Google Scholar
6. Pages-Camagna, S., “Pigments Blue et Vert Egyptiens en Question,” op. cit., 163–176.Google Scholar
7. Delamare, F., “De la Composition Bleu Egyptian Utilise en Peinture Murale GalloRomaine,” op.cit., 177–194.Google Scholar
8. Schiegl, S., and Goresy, A. El, Archaeometry 45/4 (2003) 637–658.Google Scholar
9. Wiedemann, H.G., Bayer, G. and Reller, A., “Egyptian Blue and Chinese Blue,” op.cit., 195–203.Google Scholar
10. McCarthy, B. and Vandiver, P., “Ancient High-Strength Ceramics: Fritted Faience Bracelet Manufacture at Harappa (Pakistan), ca 2300-1800 B.C.,” in Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology II, eds., Vandiver, P.B., Druzik, J. and Wheeler, G.S., MRS Symp. Proc., vol 185, 1991, pp. 495–510.Google Scholar
11. Chase, W.T., “Egyptian Blue as a Pigment and Ceramic Material,” in Brill, R.H., ed., Science and Archaeology, M.I.T Press, 1971, pp. 80–90.Google Scholar
12. Vandiver, P.V., “An Egyptian Blue Bowl from Tell Yi'nan,” in Leibowitz, H., ed., Excavations at Tell Yi'nan, U. of Texas Press, Austin, 2003, pp. 75–88.Google Scholar
13. Kingery, W.D., and Vandiver, P.B., Ceramic Masterpieces, Free Press, 1986, pp. 123–134.Google Scholar
14. Vandiver, P.B., “Craft Knowledge as an Intangible Cultural Property,” Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology VII, eds. Vandiver, P., Mass, J.L. and Murray, A., MRS Symp. Vol. 852, 2005, pp. 331–352.Google Scholar
15. McDonald, J.K., House of Eternity: The Tomb of Nefertari, J. Paul Getty Trust, Los Angeles, CA, 1996, 6, 42, 113–4.Google Scholar
16. Saleh, S. A., “Pigments, Plaster and Salts Analyses,” in Wall Painting of the Tomb of Nefertari: Scientific Studies for Their Conservation, ed. Corzo, M.A., J. Paul Getty Trust, Century City, CA, 1987, 96.Google Scholar
17. Palet, A., Porta, E. and Stulik, D., “Analyses of Pigments, Binding Media, and Varnishes,” and Rickerby, S., “Original Painting Techniques and Materials Used in the Tomb of Nefertari,” in Art and Eternity, in eds. Corzo, M.A. and Afshar, M., J. Paul Gettty Trust, Los Angeles, CA, 1993, 57, 63.Google Scholar
18. Douglas, J, McCarthy, B. and Lee, I., “Gokak: Korean Glass and Stone Comma-Shaped Beads at the Freer Gallery of Art,” Ornament 25/4 (2002) 34–39.Google Scholar
19. Jo, Kyung-mi, Yu, H.S., and Kang, H.T., “Scientific Analysis of Glass from Hwangnam-daech'ong Tomb no. 98,” Conservation Science in Museum, National Museum of Korea, 1 (1999) 61–74.Google Scholar
20. Kim, Gyu-Ho, “Scientific Analysis and Interpretation of Old Glass Beads in Korea,” Jour. of Ho-Am Museum 5 (2000) 69–77; and G.H. Kim and W.Y Huh, “SEM and X-Ray Microanalysis of Ancient Glassy Materials: An Analysis of Glass Beads Excavated at Maha-ri, Pongtam-myun, Hwasung-gun, Kyunggi Province,” Jour. of Ho-Am Art Museum 3 (1998) 65-74.Google Scholar
21. Lee, Insook, “Ancient Glass Trade in Korea,” Papers of the Brit. Assoc. for Korean Studies 5 (1994) 65–82; and Ibid., “Early Glass in Korean Archaeological Sites, Korean and Korean-American Stud. Bull. 8.1/2 (1997) 14-23.Google Scholar
22. Vint, Robert, personal communication, April 2006, and historical records and photographic documentation of the San Xavier Mission at the Arizona Historical Association, Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar
23.Radiographs on disk available from Retamoza, A., Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar