Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:42:35.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Removal of Poly(Dimethylsiloxane) Contamination from Silicon Surfaces with UV/Ozone Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

F. D. Egitto
Affiliation:
IBM Corporation, Microelectronics Division, Endicott, NY 13760.
L. J. Matienzo
Affiliation:
IBM Corporation, Microelectronics Division, Endicott, NY 13760.
J. Spalik
Affiliation:
IBM Corporation, Microelectronics Division, Endicott, NY 13760.
S. J. Fuerniss
Affiliation:
IBM Corporation, Microelectronics Division, Endicott, NY 13760.
Get access

Abstract

UV/ozone cleaning is known to be effective for removing thin organic contaminants, but removal of silicon containing contaminants is questionable. Organo-silicon contaminants, e.g., silicones, can result from a variety of integrated circuit chip and electronic packaging fabrication processes. In this investigation, films of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) on silicon substrates, with and without a gold coating, have been used to simulate such contamination up to a thickness of 50 nm. Although treatment consistently reduced the advancing DI water contact angle, in some cases from a value greater than 100° to a value less than 5°, the hydrophilic nature of the treated surfaces was not due to complete contaminant removal, i.e., a significant amount of modified contaminant remained on the surface. High resolution x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) in the Si 2p region suggest that O-Si-C bonds in the siloxane, observed prior to treatment, are converted to SiOx, where x is between 1.6 and 2. The time required to reduce the contact angle to a minimum value was greater for the thicker PDMS film samples. Deflection testing was used to evaluate the adhesion of an epoxybased adhesive to intentionally-contaminated silicon chips, before and after UV/ozone treatment. Although PDMS contamination induced loss of adhesion between the chip and the adhesive, complete conversion to silicon oxides by UV/ozone treatment of contaminants having a thickness of 5.0 nm has been demonstrated to restore adhesion to a value equivalent to that of uncontaminated silicon chip surfaces.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ganesan, G.S., Lewis, G., and Berg, H.M., Int.. J. Microcircuits Electron. Packag., 17 (2), 152 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Egitto, F.D., Vukanovic, V., and Taylor, G.N., in Plasma Deposition, Treatment, and Etching of Polymers, edited by d'Agostino, R., (Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, 1990), pp. 321422, and references therein.Google Scholar
3. Srinivasan, R. and Braren, B., in Lasers in Polymer Science and Technology: Applications, Volume III, edited by. Fouassier, J.-P. and Rabek, J.F., (CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, FL, 1990), pp. 133179.Google Scholar
4. Park, H.K., Grigoropoulos, C.P., Leung, W.P., and Tam, A.C., IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. A, 17, 631 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Vig, J.R., in Treatise on Clean Surface Technology, edited by Mittal, K.L., (Plenum Press, New York, 1987), pp. 126.Google Scholar
6. Rabek, I.F., in Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics: Volume 14, Degradation of Polymers, edited by Bamford, C.H. and Tipper, C.F.H., (Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975), pp. 423538.Google Scholar
7. Green, P.F., Palmstrom, C.J., .Mayer, J.W., and Kramer, E.J., Macromolecules, 18, 501 (1985).Google Scholar
8. Doolittle, L.R., Nucl. Instrum. Methods, B9, 344 (1985).Google Scholar
9. Li, J., Mayer, J.W., Matienzo, L.J., and Emmi, F., Mater. Chem. Phys., 32 (4), 390 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Roberts, E.D., J. Electrochem. Soc., 120, 1716 (1973).Google Scholar
11. Owen, M.J. and Smith, P.J., J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 8 (10), 1063 (1994).Google Scholar