Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:10:49.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationship Between The Void and Hillock Formation and The Grain Growth in Thin Aluminum Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

O. V. Kononenko
Affiliation:
Institute of Microelectronics Technology & High Purity Materials, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka 142432, Moscow District, Russia
V. N. Matveev
Affiliation:
Institute of Microelectronics Technology & High Purity Materials, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka 142432, Moscow District, Russia
Get access

Abstract

Void and hillock formation during annealing was studied depending on the deposition conditions. Aluminum films were deposited onto oxidized silicon substrates by the self-ion assisted technique. The bias 0 or 6 kV was applied to the substrate during deposition. The films were then annealed in vacuum for 1 hour in the temperature range from 150° to 550°C. The structure of the films was investigated by transmission electron microscopy. The void and hillock formation was studied with optical and scanning electron microscopes.

It was found that recrystallization and void and hillock formation in the films depend on the bias during deposition. Normal grain growth occurred in the films deposited without bias. Abnormal grain growth was observed in the 6 kV-films. It was also found that the mechanism of stress relaxation during thermal cycling depends on the self-ion bombardment. In the films prepared without bias, stress relaxation proceeds by diffusion creep. In the films deposited at the 6 kV bias, stress relaxation proceeds by plastic deformation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kononenko, O.V., Matveev, V.N., Kasumov, A.Yu., Kislov, N.A., and Khodos, I.I., Vacuum 46, 685 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Fionova, L.K., Kononenko, O.V., and Matveev, V.N.,. Scrizta Metallurgica et Materialia 27, 329 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Fionova, L.K., Kononenko, O.V., and Matveev, V.N., Thin Solid Films 227 (1993) 54.Google Scholar
4. Kononenko, O.V., Ivanov, E.D., Matveev, V.N., and Khodos, I.I., Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia 33, 1981 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Kononenko, O.V., and Matveev, V.N. in Thin films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties V, edited by Baker, P.S., Borgesen, P., Townsend, P.H., Ross, C.A., Volkert, C.A. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 356, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995)Google Scholar
6. Arzt, E., Kraft, O., Sanchez, J., Bader, S., and Nix, W.D., Mater.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 239, 677 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Nason, T.C., You, L., Yang, G.-R., and Lu, T.-M., J. Appl. Phys., 69, 773 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Yapsir, A.S. and Lu, T.-M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 52, 1962 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Yang, G.-R., Bai, P., Lu, T.-M., and Lau, W.M., J. Appl. Phys., 66, 4519 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Barna, A., Barna, P.B., Radnoczi, G., Reicha, F.M., and Toth, L., Phys. stat. sol. (a), 55, 427 (1979).Google Scholar