Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T17:48:38.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recycling Bleach Technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

James L. Minor*
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, WI 53705-2398
Get access

Abstract

When faced with bleaching recycled fibers, the technologist must consider the usual factors associated with the bleaching of virgin fibers plus additional factors introduced by recycling. The lignin content of the furnish and the products to be made determine whether delignifying or lignin-preserving agents are to be used. Factors introduced by recycling include mixed lignin contents, dyes, residual ink particles and carrier chemicals, contaminants, color reversion, and hornification (which affects accessibility of chromophores to bleaching reagents). In addition, the technologist must be concerned with the environmental impact of the bleaching operation.

Dithionite and formamidine sulfinic acid are effective lignin-preserving reductive bleaching agents for recycled fibers. Hydrogen peroxide is an effective lignin-preserving oxidative agent, but heavy metals and enzymes catalyze its decomposition. Chelating agents have an important role in decreasing metal content. For some delignification and effective removal of organic chromophores, oxygen and ozone show promise. Research on the use of oxygen-based oxidative bleaching agents is intense because of their favorable environmental attributes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dodson, M. and Dean, L., Pulp Paper 64(9), 190193 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Joachimides, T. and Hache, M., Tappi J. 74(1), 211215 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Allen, J., Tappi 45(2), 170A171A (1962).Google Scholar
4. Rapson, W.H. and Spinner, I.H., in The Bleaching of Pulp, edited by Singh, R.P. (TAPPI Press, 1979), p. 357.Google Scholar
5. Heimburger, S.A. and Meng, T.Y., Pulp and Paper, December, 116–119 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Putz, H-J. and Gottsching, L., TAPPI Seminar Notes “Contaminant Problems and Strategies in Wastepaper Recycling” p. 47–54 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Heimburger, S.A. and Meng, T.Y., Pulp and Paper, January, 79–83 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Risser and Associates, Background report for Magazine Publishers of America, 1990.Google Scholar
9. Freeman, H.S., Esancy, J.F., Claxton, L.D., Esancy, M.K., and Warren, S., Proceedings, 1990 International Conference, American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, Oct. 1–3, Boston, Mass. p. 180–188.Google Scholar
10. Barton, R.W., Tappi 45(2), 178A183A (1962).Google Scholar
11. The Society of Dyers and Colourists, Colour Index, 2nd ed. (Chorley & Pickersgill, Ltd., Leeds, England, 1956). 3rd ed. 1971 revised 1975, Lund, Humphries, Bradford and London.Google Scholar
12. Troemel, G., Wochbl. Papierfabr. 104(2), 7478 (1976).Google Scholar
13. Personal Communication.Google Scholar
14. Heimburger, S.A. and Meng, T.Y., Pulp and Paper, February, 139–141 (1992).Google Scholar
15. Meng, T. and Heimburger, S.. CPPA Tech ‘92 Course Notes, April 6-May 1, 1992, Toronto, Ontario (1992).Google Scholar
16. Shackford, L., Pulp and Paper, February, 75 (1992).Google Scholar
17. Angulo, J.E., Tappi J. 74(8), 135140 (1991).Google Scholar
18. van Lierop, B. and Liebergott, N., Proceedings, 1st Research Forum on Recycling, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, October 29–31 pp. 175–182 (1991).Google Scholar
19. Abadie-Maumert, F.A. and Soteland, N., Ozone Sci. and Eng. 7(3), 229239 (1985).Google Scholar
20. TAPPI Test Methods T524 om-86.Google Scholar
21. Hache, M. and Joachimides, T., TAPPI Pulping Conference, Proceedings Vol. II, 801- 812 (1991).Google Scholar
22. Myreen, B., Am. Papermaker, January, 39–41 (1992).Google Scholar
23. Markham, L.D. and Courchene, C.E., Tappi J. 71(12), 168174 (1988).Google Scholar
24. Kulikowski, T., Naddeo, R., and Magnotta, V., TAPPI Pulping Conference, Proceedings Vol. II, 781–791 (1991).Google Scholar
25. Eriksson, K-E.L., Pulp and Paper, February, 149 (1992).Google Scholar