Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T06:31:20.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reactive Plasma Sputter Deposition of Silicon Oxide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

K. K. Vossough
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
C. E. Hunt
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Get access

Abstract

Silicon dioxide films were reactively sputter deposited in argon/oxygen ambient using RF magnetron sputter deposition techniques. A substantial drop in the deposition rate at high enough partial pressure of the oxygen which is typical in reactive sputtering was observed. The best quality silicon dioxide films were obtained at the lower deposition rate, close to the deposition rate transition point. Higher quality films were obtained at higher RF powers with higher deposition rates. However, at 800 Watts RF, the so called negative ion effect dominates and results in higher surface roughness of the films, as seen by AFM results. Various characterization techniques including ellipsometry and wet chemical etching were used to compare stoichiometry and film density, respectively. MOS capacitor characterization along with breakdown voltages were also measured as a means of qualifying the films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

V. References

1. Folta, J. A., Hunt, C.E. and Far-ens, S. N., J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol. 141, No. 8 (1994)Google Scholar
2. Yachi, T., Serikawa, T. and Wada, T., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, Vol. ED–31, No. 12 (1984)Google Scholar
3. Vossen, and Kern, , Thin Film Processes II, (Academic Press, Boston, 1991), p. 191.Google Scholar
4. Berg, S., Larsson, T., and Blom, H-O., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A4, 594 (1986)Google Scholar
5. Berg, S., Blom, H-O., Larsson, T., and Nender, C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A5, 202 (1987)Google Scholar
6. Larsson, T., Blom, H-O., Nender, C., and Berg, S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A6, 1832 (1988)Google Scholar
7. Cuomo, J.J., Gambino, R. J., Harper, J. M. E., Kuptsis, J. D. and Webber, J. C., J. Vac. Sci. Tecnol. 15(2), March/April 1978 Google Scholar
8. Rossnagel, S. M. and Cuomo, J. J., P.106, AIP (1988)Google Scholar
9. Maniv, S. and Westwood, W. D., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 17, 743 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Cuomo, J. J., Gambino, R. J., Harper, J. M. E., Kuptsis, J. D. and Webber, J. C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 15(2), March/April 1978 Google Scholar