Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T17:24:27.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radioactive Tracer Study Performed in a Dipole Geometry in a Highly Conductive Fracture Zone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Johan Byegård
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
Gunnar Skarnemark
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
Mats Skålberg
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology, S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

A radioactive tracer experiment has been performed in a highly conductive fracture zone, using a dipole geometry. Anions (131I and 82Br) and complexed metal ions (51Cr-EDTA, 58Co-EDTA, 111In-EDTA, 140La-DOTA, 160Tb-EDTA, 169Yb-EDTA and 177Lu-DOTA) have been injected and their properties as non-sorbing tracers were evaluated. Besides, studies of slightlysorbing cations (24Na+, 58Co2+, 86Rb+ and 201T1+) were performed. 99mTcO4 and its chemical analogue 186ReO4 were also injected to study the behaviour of Tc at low redox-potentials. Breakthrough was obtained for Re and for all metal complexes and anions. Some differences in the recovery yields could be seen. No transport of cations, except for Na, could be measured. No breakthrough of Tc could be observed. This indicates that TcO4 was reduced and sorbed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co (SKB), Final Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel - KBS-3, edited by Svenke, E. and Nilsson, L.B. (SKB, Stockholm 1983).Google Scholar
2. Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate (SKI), SKI Report No. 87:4, 1987.Google Scholar
3. Toulhoat, P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 50, 755762 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Chrysikopoulos, C.V. and Kruger, P., Appl. Geochem. 329335 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Jester, W.A., Brienco, M., Jarrett, A.R., Sakuma, S.H. and Yu, C., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 110 (1), 215220 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Drabaek, I., J. Radioanal. Chem. 75, 97106 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Behrens, H., Moser, H., Wildner, E., J. Radioanal. Chem. 38, 491498 (1977).Google Scholar
8. Ahlbom, K., Smelie, J.A.T., SKB Techn. Rep. 89–19. (1989).Google Scholar
9. Smith, R.M. and Martell, A.E., Critical Stability Constants vol 1 (Plenum Press, New York, 1976) p. 205.Google Scholar
10. Loncin, M.F., Desreux, J.F. and Merciny, E., Inorg. Chem. 25, 26462648 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Brookins, D.G., Appl. Geochem. 1, 513517 (1986).Google Scholar