Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:37:12.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative Defect Analysis on Solar Cells by Laser Beam Induced Current (LBIC) Measurements and 3D Network Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

Minh Nguyen
Affiliation:
Corporate Research, Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany Institute for Materials Science, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
Andreas Schütt
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Science, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
Jürgen Carstensen
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Science, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
Helmut Föll
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Science, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Measurements with the CELLO (solar cell local characterization) technique in the LBIC (laser beam induced current) mode under dark conditions with various constant bias voltages are used to analyze the lateral distribution, and mean values, of photocurrent response maps. Local solar cell defects such as local shunts were found to have a characteristic bias voltage dependence: At negative and small positive voltages a local shunt resistance gives less current response than the adjacent area. Upon applying higher positive voltages, a transition of the mean value to lower current response and an inversion of the local defect characteristics are found. These results were modeled by a newly introduced three dimensional (3D) equivalent circuit model of a solar cell divided into subcells.

Measurements and simulations of solar cells with various local defects show our method to be a new powerful tool for the quantitative analysis of local solar cell defects.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Green, M.A. et al. ., Prog. Photovolt.: Res. Appl. 20 (2012) 1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rösch, R. et al. ., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 97 (2012) 176180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breitenstein, O. et al. ., “Lock-in Thermography”, 2 nd edition, Springer 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straube, H. et al. ., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 95 (2011) 27682771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorasayan, P. et al. ., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93 (2009) 917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorasayan, P. et al. ., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 95 (2011) 111114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstensen, J. et al. ., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 76 (2003) 599611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glatthaar, M. et al. ., Phys. Stat. Sol. RRL 4 (2010) 1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geißendörfer, S. et al. ., MRS Proc., 1321, mrss11-1321-a08-09 Google Scholar
Nguyen, M. et al. ., Proc. 27th European Photovolt. Sol. Energy Conf., Frankfurt a. M., Germany (2012) 3DV.1.59 Google Scholar