Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:05:27.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PZT and PLZT thin films on Cu substrates for dielectric and piezoelectric applications: Effect of processing atmosphere and film strain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Taeyun Kim
Affiliation:
tkim@unity.ncsu.edu, North Carolina State University, 324 Research Building 1, Campus Box 7919, 1001 Capability drive, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7919, United States
Sudarsan Srinivasan
Affiliation:
ssrinivasan@anl.gov
Angus I Kingon
Affiliation:
Angus_Kingon@ncsu.edu
Get access

Abstract

PZT (52/48) and PLZT (7/65/35) thin films were prepared by chemical solution deposition (CSD) on Pt/SiO2/Si and Cu foil substrate, respectively. For PZT thin films on Pt/SiO2/Si substrates, pO2 control during thermal treatment affected both perovskite phase formation and orientation, but did not show significant impact on the ferroelectric and dielectric properties. When PLZT thin films (7/65/35) were prepared on Cu foil to tailor ferroelectric/dielectric properties, it was observed that ferroelectric and dielectric properties were significantly affected by the strains, possibly from the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) mismatch between PLZT and Cu foil during cooling after high temperature crystallization. It was also experimentally observed that, depending on the direction of applied strain, the PLZT films could be cycled between ferroelectric and paraelectric phases. It was suggested that PZT based thin films on base metal substrate requires very careful processing for optimized electrical performance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Al-Shareef, H. N., Auciello, O., and Kingon, A. I., J. Appl. Phys. 77 (5) 2146 (1995).Google Scholar
2 Ledermann, N., Baborowski, J., Seifert, A., Willing, B., Hiboux, S., Muralt, P., Setter, N., and Forster, M., Integr. Ferroelectr. 35 (1-4) 177 (2001).Google Scholar
3 Ihlefeld, J., Laughlin, B., Hunt-Lowery, A., Borland, W., Kingon, A., and Maria, J-P., J. Electroceram. 14 (2), 95 (2005).Google Scholar
4 Kingon, A. I. and Srinivasan, S., Nature Mater. 4 (3) 233 (2005).Google Scholar
5 Losego, M. D., Jimison, L. H., Ihlefeld, J. F., and Maria, J-P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 (17) 172906 (2005).Google Scholar
6 Jones, R. E. Jr., Maniar, P. D., Olowolafe, J. O., Campbell, A. C., and Mogab, C. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60 (8) 1022 (1992).Google Scholar
7 Toshihiko, T. and Payne, D. A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 (51) 1242 (1994).Google Scholar
8 Chikarmane, V., Sudhama, C., Kim, J., Lee, J., Tasch, A., and Novak, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 (22) 2850 (1991).Google Scholar
9 Cho, S. M. and Jeon, D. Y., Thin Solid Films, 338, 149 (1999).Google Scholar
10 Yokosuka, M. and Marutake, M., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 25 (7) 981 (1986).Google Scholar
11 Kim, T., Hanson, J. N., Gruverman, A., Streiffer, S. K., and Kingon, A. I., to be submitted.Google Scholar