Skip to main content Accessibility help

PWR Fuel Element Neutronic Analysis with Burnable Poison Rods Using Zircaloy and Hi-Nicalon Type S Claddings

  • R. B. de Faria (a1) (a2), J. G. Mantecón (a1), A. R. Hamers (a1), A. L. Costa (a1) (a2), A. Fortini (a1) (a2) and C. Pereira (a1) (a2)...


The alloy composed of zirconium has been used effectively for over 50 years in claddings of nuclear fuel, especially for PWR type reactors. However, to increase fuel enrichment with the aim of rising the burning and maintaining the safety of nuclear plants, is of great relevance the study of new materials that can replace safely and efficiently zircaloy cladding. Among several proposed material, silicon carbide (SiC) has a potential to replace zircaloy as fuel cladding material due to its high-temperature tolerance, chemical stability and a low absorption cross-section for thermal neutrons. In this paper, the goal is to expand the study with silicon carbide cladding, checking its behavior when submitted to an environment with burnable poison variations, the impact on multiplication factor and reactivity coefficients to both claddings: zircaloy and silicon carbide. The neutronic analysis was made using the SCALE 6.0 (Standardized Computer Analysis for Licensing Evaluation) code. This code system is widely accepted and used worldwide for safety analysis, and criticality of nuclear reactors has been utilized to model a typical fuel element of a PWR.



Hide All
1. Hallstadius, L., Johnson, S. and Lahoda, E., Ed. Cladding for high performance fuel. Progress in Nuclear Energy 57, 7176 (2012).
2. Dobisesky, J. P.. Reactor physics considerations for implementing silicon carbide cladding into a PWR environment. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (2011).
3. Snead, L. L., et al. , Handbook of SiC properties for fuel performance modeling. Journal of Nuclear Materials 371 (2007) 329.
4. Bloore, D. A.. Reactor physics assessment of thick silicon carbide clad PWR fuels. Massachusetts, (2005).
5. Bansal, N. P. (Ed.), Handbook of Ceramic Composites, X, 554 p., Hardcover (2005).
6. Bowman, S. M., KENO-VI Primer: A Primer for Criticality Calculations with SCALE/KENO-VI Using GeeWiz. Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA: ORNL/TM-2008/069 (2008).
7. Dehart, M. D.. TRITON: A Two-dimensional Transport and Depletion Module for Characterization of Spent Nuclear Fuel. Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA : ORNL/TM-2005/39, Version 6, Vol. I, Sect. T1 (2009).
8. OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Burn-up Credit Criticality Benchmark - Phase II-D - PWR-UO2 Assembly Study of Control Rod Effects on Spent Fuel Composition, NEA N° 6227, ISBN: 92-64-02316-X, France, (2006).
9. de Faria, R. B., Torres, F., Monteiro, F. B. A., and Pereira, C.. Replacement zircaloy for silicon carbide as fuel cladding material in PWR – A neutronic evaluation. MRS Proceedings, volume 1769 (2015).
10. Eletrobrás Termonuclear S.A. Eletronuclear. Final Safety Analysis Report Central Nuclear Almirante Álvaro Alberto. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, UNIT2. REV.1 Status 08/99 (1999).
12. Bowman, S. M. and Dunn, M. E., SCALE Cross-section Libraries, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA: ORNL/TM-2005/39, Version 6, Vol. III, Sect. M4 (2009).
13. Rashed, A. H.. Properties and characteristics of silicon carbide. Poco Graphife, Inc. (2002)
14. Deck, C. P., Khalifa, H. E., Sammuli, B., Hilsabeck, T., Back, C. A.. Fabrication of SiC-SiC composites for fuel cladding in advanced reactor designs. Progress in Nuclear Energy 57, 3845 (2012).
17. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2001, “RELAP5/MOD3.3 Beta Code Manual, Vol. IV – Models and Correlations”, Nuclear Safety Analysis Division, NUREG/CR-5535/Rev 1-Vol IV, Washington, DC, (2001).
18. Kubascheswski, O. and Alcock, C. B.. Metallurgical Thermochemistry. 5th Edition, Pergamon Press, New York (1979).
19. Duderstadt, J. J., Hamilton, J. L., Nuclear Reactor Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1976).
20. access 10/15/2015.


PWR Fuel Element Neutronic Analysis with Burnable Poison Rods Using Zircaloy and Hi-Nicalon Type S Claddings

  • R. B. de Faria (a1) (a2), J. G. Mantecón (a1), A. R. Hamers (a1), A. L. Costa (a1) (a2), A. Fortini (a1) (a2) and C. Pereira (a1) (a2)...


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed