Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:08:39.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Processing, Microstructure, and Fracture Behavior of Nickel/ Nickel Aluminide Multilayered Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. Banerjee
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
J. P. Fain
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
G. B. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
P. M. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
H. L. Fraser
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
Get access

Abstract

The Ni-Ni3Al system is the basis of a large number of Ni-based superalloys used extensively in the aerospace industry. The mechanical properties of bulk superalloys, which primarily consist of a Ni-based fcc matrix reinforced with cubic precipitates of Ni3Al, have been extensively researched. The goal of the present study is to investigate the mechanical properties of multilayered Ni / Ni3Al nanocomposites in the thin film form. These multilayers have been processed using UHV magnetron sputtering by alternate deposition of pure elemental Ni and Ni-25at%Al layers in the range of 20 nm – 120 nm. By varying the substrate material and processing parameters such as deposition temperature, multilayers with two types of interfacial orientations. (111) Ni //(111) Ni3Al and (002) Ni //(002) Ni3Al have been fabricated. Microstructural and phase characterization of the multilayers in both plan-view as well as cross-section geometries have been carried out using x-ray diffraction, SEM and TEM and the results of these will be discussed. Both orientations exhibited a high density of twins lying on the {111} planes. The loss of coherency in these multilayers as a function of the layer thickness will also be discussed. The cross-section fracture behavior of these multilayers has been studied by SEM fractography. Failure mode for fracture was a result of the application of tensile stresses. Interesting effects of the interfacial orientation and the layer thickness on the fracture surface of these multilayers will be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kear, B. H. and Wilsdorf, H. G. F., Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME, 224, 382 (1962).Google Scholar
2. Paider, V., Pope, D. P. and Vitek, V., Acta Metall., 32, 435 (1984).Google Scholar
3. Anderson, P. M., Foecke, T. and Hazzledine, P. M., MRS Bulletin, 24(2), 27 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Banerjee, R., Thompson, G. B., Zhang, X. D., Anderson, P. M. and Fraser, H. L, submitted to J. Mater. Res. (1999).Google Scholar
5. Hyland, R. W., Asta, M., Foiles, S. M. and Rohrer, C. L., Acta Mater., 46(10), 3667 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Was, G. S. and Foecke, T., Thin Solid Films, 286, 1 (1996).Google Scholar