Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:17:52.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Processing Map for Zr-based In-situ β Phase Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Seung-Yub Lee
Affiliation:
sylee@iastate.edu, Iowa State University, Materials Science and Engineering, 2220 Hoover Hall, Ames, IA, 50011-2300, United States, 515-294-6676
John J.Z. Li
Affiliation:
jli@caltech.edu, California Institute of Technology, Materials Science, Pasadena, CA, 91125, United States
Jin-yoo Suh
Affiliation:
jinyoo@caltech.edu, California Institute of Technology, Materials Science, Pasadena, CA, 91125, United States
Won-Kyu Rhim
Affiliation:
wkrhim@caltech.edu, California Institute of Technology, Materials Science, Pasadena, CA, 91125, United States
William L. Johnson
Affiliation:
wlj@caltech.edu, California Institute of Technology, Materials Science, Pasadena, CA, 91125, United States
Ersan Ustundag
Affiliation:
ustundag@iastate.edu, Iowa State University, Materials Science and Engineering, Ames, IA, 50011, United States
Get access

Abstract

The processing map for Zr-based bulk metallic glasses with crystalline in-situ precipitates (â phase) has been constructed from high temperature phase information, chemical composition analysis, and â phase crystallization kinetics. The phase evolution was detected in-situ by high energy synchrotron X-ray, and kinetic information on crystalline phase was measured from electrostatic levitation facility (ESL). This processing map offers a unique opportunity to control both volume and size of the dendritic â phase through composition and processing condition manipulation. The volume fraction of â phase can be customized from 6% to 93 %, and dendrite size is controllable between 1 and 50 µm at the current stage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Choi-Yim, H., Busch, R., Koster, U., and Johnson, W.L.: Synthesis and characterization of particulate reinforced Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6 bulk metallic glass composites. Acta Mater. 47, 2455 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Choi-Yim, H., Schroers, J., and Johnson, W.L.: Microstructures and mechanical properties of tungsten wire/particle reinforced Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6 metallic glass matrix composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1906 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Clausen, B., Lee, S.Y., Ustundag, E., Aydiner, C.C., Conner, R.D., and Bourke, M.A.M.: Compressive yielding of tungsten fiber reinforced bulk metallic glass composites. Scripta Mater. 49, 123 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Conner, R.D., Dandliker, R.B., and Johnson, W.L.: Mechanical properties of tungsten and steel fiber reinforced Zr41.25Ti13.75Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 metallic glass matrix composites. Acta Mater. 46, 6089 (1998).Google Scholar
5. Hays, C.C., Kim, C.P., and Johnson, W.L.: Microstructure controlled shear band pattern formation and enhanced plasticity of bulk metallic glasses containing in situ formed ductile phase dendrite dispersions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2901 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Lee, S.Y., Clausen, B., Ustundag, E., Choi-Yim, H., Aydiner, C.C., and M.Bourke, A.M.: Compressive behavior of wire reinforced bulk metallic glass matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A. 399, 128 (2005).Google Scholar
7. Clausen, B., Lee, S.Y., Ustundag, E., Kim, C.P., Brown, D.W., and Bourke, M.A.M.: Deformation of in-situ-reinforced bulk metallic glass matrix composites.(Materials Science Forum, 2002), p. 553.Google Scholar
8. Hays, C.C., Kim, C.P., and Johnson, W.L.: Improved mechanical behavior of bulk metallic glasses containing in situ formed ductile phase dendrite dispersions. Mater. Sci. Eng., A. 304, 650 (2001).Google Scholar
9. Szuecs, F., Kim, C.P., and Johnson, W.L.: Mechanical properties of Zr56.2Ti13.8Nb5.0Cu6.9Ni5.6Be12.5 ductile phase reinforced bulk metallic glass composite. Acta Mater. 49, 1507 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Clausen, B., Lee, S.Y., Ustundag, E., Kim, C.P., Brown, D.W., and Bourke, M.A.M.: Compressive deformation of in situ formed bulk metallic glass composites. Scripta Mater. 54, 343 (2006).Google Scholar
11. Kim, C.P.: Ductile phase reinforced bulk metallic glass composites formed by chemical partitioning. (California Institute of Technology Ph.D. Thesis, 2001), p. 48.Google Scholar
12. Larson, A.C. and Dreele, R.B. Von, GSAS-General Structure Analysis System, LAUR 86-748. 1986: Los Alamos National Laboratory.Google Scholar
13. Rietveld, H.M.: Line Profiles of Neutron Powder-Diffraction Peaks for Structure Refinement. Acta Crystallogr. 22, 151 (1967).Google Scholar
14. Cullity, B.D., Elements of X-Ray Diffraction. 1978, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 407.Google Scholar
15. Lee, S.Y., Kim, C. P., Almer, J.D., Lienert, U., Ustundag, E., and Johnson, W.L.: Pseudo-binary phase diagram for Zr-based in-situ β phase composites. J. Mater. Res. 22, 539 (2007)Google Scholar
16. Lee, S.Y.: Deformation Mechanisms of Bulk Metallic Glass Matrix Composites. (California Institute of Technology Ph.D Thesis, 2005), p.97.Google Scholar
17. Mukherjee, S.: Study of crystallization behavior, kinetics and thermodynamics of bulk metallic glasses using noncontact electrostatic levitation technique. (California Institute of Technology Ph.D. Thesis, 2005), p. 117.Google Scholar