Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:02:25.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Process Optimization for Nanocrystalline Cellulose Production from Microcrystalline Cellulose

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Christophe Danumah  and
Hicham Fenniri
Christophe Danumah
Affiliation:
National Institute for Nanotechnology and Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2M9, Canada
Hicham Fenniri
Affiliation:
National Institute for Nanotechnology and Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2M9, Canada
Get access

Abstract

A process optimization has been developed for obtaining nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) by acid hydrolysis of commercially available microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) in high yield (~ 40-50%). This method was based on control of key parameters such as the rate of addition of sulfuric acid solution to the MCC/water suspension, the mixing speed, the volume of collected NCC suspensions and the volume ratio of NCC suspension to water during dialysis. The resulting NCC products were characterized by x-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), elemental analysis (EA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Electron microscopy results showed that the rod-shaped NCC had lengths and widths of about 40-400 nm and 5-40 nm, respectively.

Keywords

biomaterialnanostructurecrystalline
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1312: Symposium HH/II/JJ – Polymer-Based Materials and Composites—Synthesis, Assembly and Applications , 2011 , mrsf10-1312-jj05-25
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. de Souza Lima, M.M. and Borsali, R., Macromol. Rapid Commun. 25, 771 (2004).Google Scholar
2. Habibi, Y., Goffin, A.-L., Schiltz, N., Duquesne, E., Dubois, P., Dufresne, A., J. Mater. Chem. 18, 5002 (2008).Google Scholar
3. Azizi Samir, M.A.S., Alloin, F., Dufresne, A., Biomolecules 6, 612 (2005).Google Scholar
4. Beck-Candanedo, S., Roman, M., Gray, D.G., Biomolecules 6, 1048 (2005).Google Scholar
5. Polymer Nanocomposites and Their Applications, edited by Sinha Ray, S. and Bousmina, M., (American Scientific Publishers, New York, 2006) 600p.Google Scholar
6. Hubbe, M.A., Rojas, O.J., Lucia, L.A., and Sain, M., BioRessources 3 (3), 929 (2008).Google Scholar
7. Hamad, W., Can J. Chem. Eng. 84, 513 (2006)Google Scholar
8. Hamad, W.Y. and Hu, T.Q., Can. J. Chem. Eng. 88, 392 (2010).Google Scholar
9. Bondeson, D., Mathew, A.P., Oksman, K., Cellulose 13, 171 (2006).Google Scholar
10. Figure1- Image from http://forestproducts.orst.edu/faculty/simonsen/Nanocomposites.pdf Google Scholar
11. Marchessault, R.H., Morehead, F.F. and Koch, M.J., J. Colloid Sci. 16, 327 (1961).Google Scholar
12. Mathew, A. P., Oksman, K., and Sain, M., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 97, 2014 (2005)Google Scholar
13. Marcovich, N.E., Auad, M.L., Bellesi, N.E., Nutt, S.R., Aranguren, M.I.J., J. Mater. Res. 21, 870 (2002).Google Scholar
14. Dujardin, E., Blaseby, M. and Mann, S., J. Mater. Chem. 13, 696 (2003).Google Scholar
15. Dong, S. and Roman, M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 13810 (2007).Google Scholar