Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T15:36:48.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pressure and Strain Effects on Diffusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

A. Antonelli
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
J. Bernholc
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Get access

Abstract

We have investigated, via parameter-free calculations, the effects of hydrostatic and nonhydrostatic strains on the energetics of defect formation and self-diffusion in silicon. The three microscopic mechanisms, vacancy, interstitial, and concerted exchange, have very similar activation enthalpies at zero pressure but exhibit different behavior with hydrostatic pressure. Our results suggest that experiments performed at different pressures can determine the relative contributions of each of these mechanisms. The calculations also show that the neutral Si vacancy has a negative relaxation volume, with the nearest neighbors of the vacancy relaxing inwards, in contrast to the Si (111) surface. Large nonhydrostatic strains, which are present in e.g. Si/GexSi1-x pseudomorphic heterostractures, substantially reduce the formation energy of the tetrahedral interstitial, but do not affect the formation energy of the vacancy. These findings suggest that, aside from being another useful tool for the investigation of self-diffusion in Si, nonhydrostatic strain may significantly affect annealing and impurity diffusion in strained heterostructures. In particular, the interstitial-assisted impurity diffusion may proceed more rapidly in Si lattice-matched to GexSi1-x, but be slowed down in GexSi1-x lattice-matched to Si. The compressed GexSi1-x layers may thus act as diffusion barriers for impurities diffusing with help of native interstitials, such as B or P.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Frank, W., Gösele, U., Mehrer, H., and Seeger, A., in Diffusion in Crystalline Solids, edited by Murch, G. E. and Nowick, A. S. (Academic, Orlando, FL, 1985), p. 64.Google Scholar
2 Frank, W. and Stolwikj, N. A., in Vacancies and Interstitials in Metals and Alloys, edited by Abromeit, C. and Wollenberger, H., Materials Science Forum 15–18 (Trans. Tech. Publications, Aedermannsdorf, Switzerland, 1987), p. 369.Google Scholar
3 Car, R., Kelly, P. J., Oshiyama, A., and Pantelides, S. T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1814 (1984).Google Scholar
4 Bar-Yam, Y. and Joannopoulos, J. D., in Proceedings of the Thirteenth Tntemational Conference on Defects in Semiconductors, edited by Kimerling, L. C. and Parsey, J. M. (The Mettalurgical Society, American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, New York, 1985), p. 261.Google Scholar
5 Pandey, K. C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2287 (1986).Google Scholar
6 Lazarus, D. and Nachtrieb, N. H., in Solids Under Pressure, edited by Paul, W. and Warschauer, D. M. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963), p. 43.Google Scholar
7 Aziz, M. J., Nygren, E., Christie, W. H., White, C. W., and Turnbull, D., in Impurity Diffusion and Gettering in Silicon, edited by Fair, R. B., Pearce, C. W., and Washburn, J., Materials Research Symposia Proceedings, vol. 36 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985), p. 101.Google Scholar
8 Nygren, E., Aziz, M. J., Turnbull, D., Poate, J. M., Jacobson, D. C., and Hull, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 105 (1985).Google Scholar
9 Manda, M. L., Shepard, M. L., Fair, R. B., and Massoud, H. Z., in Impurity Diffusion and Gettering in Silicon, edited by Fair, R. B., Pearce, C. W., and Washburn, J., Materials Research Symposia Proceedings, vol. 36 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985), p. 71.Google Scholar
10 Hamann, D. R., Schluter, M., and Chiang, C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1494 (1979).Google Scholar
11 Chadwick, A. V. and Glyde, H. R., in Rare Gas Solids, edited by Klein, M. L. and Venables, J. A. (Academic, London, 1977), Vol II, p. 1151; G. Jacucci and R. Taylor, J. Phys. F 9, 1489 (1979).Google Scholar
12 Watkins, G. D., Troxell, J. T., and Chatterjee, A. P., in Proceedings of the International Conference on Defects and Radiation Effects in Semiconductors, edited by Albany, J. H., Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 46 (Institute of Physics, London, 1979), p. 16.Google Scholar
13 Antonelli, A. and Bemholc, J., Phys. Rev. B 40, 10463 (1989).Google Scholar
14 Baraff, G. A., Kane, E. O., and Schluter, M., Phys. Rev. B 21, 5662 (1980); U Lindfelt, Phys. Rev. B 28, 4150 (1983); M. Scheffler, J. P. Vigneron, and G. B. Bachelet, Phys. Rev. B 31, 6541 (1985).Google Scholar
15 Kelly, P. J., Car, R., and Pantelides, S. T., in Defects in Semiconductors, edited by Bardeleben, H. J., Materials Science Forum 10–12 (Trans. Tech. Publications, Aedermannsdorf, Switzerland, 1986), p. 115.Google Scholar
16 Barnes, C. E. and Samara, G., in Microscopic Identification of Electronic Defects in Semiconductors, edited by Johnson, N. M., Bishop, S. G., Watkins, G. D., Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings, Vol. 46 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA 1985), p. 471.Google Scholar
17 Van de Walle, C. G. and Martin, R. M., Phys. Rev. B 34, 5621 (1986).Google Scholar
18 Fahey, P., Barbuscia, G., Moslehi, M., and Dutton, R. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 46, 784 (1985).Google Scholar
19 Nichols, C. S., Van de Walle, C. G., and Pantelides, S. T., Phys. Rev. B 40, 5484 (1989).Google Scholar